Pastures & Pastoralism

(ISSN: 2817-3457; CODEN: PPAAC2; DOI: 10.33002/pp) is an international, scientific double blind peer-reviewed open access journal published annually (once a year) online by The Grassroots Institute.

Open Access—free for readers, with article processing charges (APC) paid by authors or their institutions.

High Visibility: Indexing is proposed in the WoS, Scopus and other databases.

Time for Processing: Primary acceptance to the submitted article is given in 1 week time. After consent of author(s), manuscript is peer-reviewed, and a first decision provided to authors in 2-4 weeks after submission.

Recognition of Reviewers: The reviewers who provide timely, thorough peer-review reports receive vouchers entitling them to a discount on the APC of their next publication in the journal, in appreciation of the work done. Reviewers also receive Certificate for their voluntary service.

VOLUME 03 (2025) | Pastures & Pastoralism

Gradually, pasturelands are being converted into other land uses or enclosed for exclusive uses under various national laws or policies. Resilience of pastoralist communities to the changing environments – ecological, economic and political – has great potential to protecting and conserving the pastureland landscapes or waterscapes. Such resilience is more talked in context of climate change and its impact on the herder communities surviving in marginal environments. In the view of widespread regional and national policy failures and modernity-catalyzed societal rejection of transhumance and nomadic pastoralism, International Year of Rangelands and Pastoralists 2026 declared by the United Nations General Assembly is a grand opportunity for all to revitalize the least-external-input driven systems of livestock raising and mobility across the continents. This international blind peer-review journal, ‘Pastures & Pastoralism’, will contribute to the science, policy and practice across the world by providing a novel platform to seasoned, budding and young scientists, experts and practitioners, including the pastoral community members.

VOLUME 3, (2025)

M – 00542Research Article

Shimglina Customary Conflict Resolution Mechanism for Rural Land Disputes in Ethiopia: The Practice and Challenges

Asmare Shetahun Alemneh

Department of Political Science and International Relation, College of Social Science and Humanities, Arba Minch University, Ethiopia. Email: asmare.shetahun@amu.edu.et, asmareshitahun@gmail.com | ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0005-4405-9236

Pastures & Pastoralism, 03, 1-20. Doi: https://doi.org/10.33002/pp0301

Received: 14 September 2024

Reviewed: 17 December 2024

Revised: 11 February 2025

Accepted: 15 February 2025

Published: 15 May 2025


                                    

Review Reports

Editing Work

Ethical Declarations

Download Full Paper [PDF]

Download Full Paper [XML]


                                    

No. of Views:

free web counter

No. of Full Paper Views:

No. of Paper Downloads:

ABSTRACT

Rural land disputes were instigated due to various factors like the increases in population number, scarcity of farm land, poverty, increase in rural land value, and weak rural land administration system, which were the indirect causes and manifested in the forms of boundary disputes, inheritances disputes, transfer of land disputes, access, and ownership disputes. This study indicates that different variants of Shimglina customary conflict resolution mechanisms are playing a significant role resolving in rural land disputes. Shimglina prevents violence too. The social capital and social solidarity of the community is functional under the umbrella of Shimglina and vice versa. Shimglina is vital to resolving conflict and disputes in terms of its attachment with the living God, value of perpetual peace, reduction of time to decide on the issue, resource and its accessibility to all members of the community, and restoring peaceful interaction. This study reveals that Shimglina faced many challenges that hinder its effectiveness in the resolution of rural land disputes. Unless the underlying challenges of Shimglina are solved, the effectiveness of the mechanism in the resolution of rural land dispute is difficult. Thus, the absence of clear legal and policy framework in the practices of Shimglina, lack of support and encouragements to the Shimglina culture of peace by the government, the absence of strong enforcement mechanism for the decision of elders, the influence and intervention of government bodies and politicization of Shimglina culture are the challenges in the practices of Shimglina in rural land disputes resolution. The local and regional governments should work to advance Shimglina peace culture for rural land disputes settlement, peaceful co-existence, and community solidarity.

Keywords

Rural Land; Disputes; Traditional/customary conflict resolution; Challenges to customary/traditional conflict resolution; Peace, Shimglina, Peace lovers

REFERENCES

Alemie, A., & Hone, M. (2018). Roles of Indigenous Conflict Resolution Mechanisms for Maintaining

ANRS Council (2006). The Revised Amhara National Regional State Rural Land Administration and Use

Bamlak, Y. (2013). Assessment of Indigenous Conflict Resolution Systems and Practices: Implication for

Bedasa, N. A., & Hussein, J. W. (2018). Challenges in Managing Land-Related Conflicts in East Hararghe

Behailu, D. (2015). Transfer of Land Rights in Ethiopia: Towards A Sustainable Policy Framework. Eleven

Birhanu, B. (2018). Ethnic Federalism and Inter-Ethnic Relations in Ethiopia: A Focus on the Peoples of

Boege, V. (2006). Traditional Approaches to Conflict Transformation: Potentials and Limits. In, Fischer, M.,

DOA (2000). Annual progress report. Bahir Dar Zuria Woreda Department of Agriculture, Bahir Dar,

Durkheim, E. (1984). The Division of Labor in Society (W.D. Halls, Trans.). London: MacMillan.

Endalew, L. (2014). Ethiopian Customary Dispute Resolution Mechanisms: Forms of Restorative Justice?,

Esayase, A. (2015). Indigenous conflict resolution institutions: A study among the Gofa People of the

Gashu, A. & Amsalu, T. (2017). Decentralised Rural Land Administration in Ethiopia: The Case of Amhara

Getachew, M. (1998). Capacity Building for Local Development: A Comparative Study of Formal and

Girma, G. (2014). The Role of Sidama Traditional Institution in Rural Land Dispute Resolution: A Case

Gonfa, E. (2014). Customary conflict resolution among the Haro Limmu Oromo of Northwest Wallaga:

Kariuki, F. (2015). Conflict Resolution by Elders in Africa: Successes, Challenges and Opportunities.

Kassa, S. A. (2020). Managing land conflicts in plural societies: Intergroup land governance in Ethiopia.

Luccaro, T. (2016). Customary Justice: An Introduction to Basic Concepts, Strengths, and Weaknesses:

Macfarlane, J. (2006). Working towards restorative justice in Ethiopia: Integrating traditional conflict

Mequanent, G. (2016). The Application of Traditional Dispute Resolution in Land Administration in Lay

Mulugeta, G. & Tefera, E. (2009). Alternative Dispute Resolution: Teaching Material. Justice and Legal

Murithi, T. (2006). African approaches to building Peace and social solidarity: Reflections on Ubuntu. The

Niang, T. & Dieng, S. D. (2004). Land tenure and family farming in Africa: With special reference to

Parsons, T. (1991). The Social System. With a   New Preface by Bryan S. Turner. London: Routledge.

Regassa, T. (2008). Restorative Justice in Oromia, Baseline Study. Addis Ababa: Central Printing Press.

Sanginga, P. C., Kamugisha, R. N., & Martin, A. M. (2007). The Dynamics of Social Capital and Conflict

Sewnet, A. A. (2018). The nature of land expropriation and compensation in Amhara National Regional

Shewakena, A. (2007). An assessment of rural land registration and land information system in Amhara

Shibeshi, G. B., Fuchs, H., & Mansberger, R. (2015). Lessons from systematic evaluations of land

Siyum, B. A., Bihon Kassa, B. S., Gebremedhin, M. A., & Mekelle, E. (2015). Farm Land Conflict and its

Solomon, G. (1992). Conflict Management in Traditional Amhara Society, in Alula Pankhurst and Tshai

Wondyrad, A. (2018). The Practice of Indigenous Conflict Management Systems in a Multiethnic Society:

World Bank (2012). Federal Democratic Republic of Ethiopia - Options for strengthening land

Yohannes, B. (2003). Shemglina (moot): Indigenous Institutions for resolving conflicts outside the

Yonas, T. (2011). Women and Land Rights in Rural Ethiopia: The Case of Wolaita. Thesis Submitted to

Yoseph, G. (2006). Bahelawi erq bemisraq Gojjam Mestedader zone Debay Tilat Gin Worda (Traditional

Zerihun, H. (2016). Land Governance Assessment Framework Implementation in Ethiopia. Final Country

HOW TO CITE THIS PAPER?
APA Style

Alemneh, A. S. (2025). Shimglina Customary Conflict Resolution Mechanism for Rural Land Disputes in Ethiopia: The Practice and Challenges. Pastures & Pastoralism, 03, 1-20. https://doi.org/10.33002/pp0301

Harvard Style

Alemneh, A.S. (2025). Shimglina Customary Conflict Resolution Mechanism for Rural Land Disputes in Ethiopia: The Practice and Challenges. Pastures & Pastoralism, 03: 1-20. Doi: https://doi.org/10.33002/pp0301

ACS Style

Alemneh, A. S. Shimglina Customary Conflict Resolution Mechanism for Rural Land Disputes in Ethiopia: The Practice and Challenges. Pastures & Pastoralism, 2025, 03, 1-20. https://doi.org/10.33002/pp0301

Chicago/Turabian Style

Alemneh, Asmare Shetahun. 2025. “Shimglina Customary Conflict Resolution Mechanism for Rural Land Disputes in Ethiopia: The Practice and Challenges”. Pastures & Pastoralism, 03: 1-20. https://doi.org/10.33002/pp0301

AAA Style

Alemneh, Asmare Shetahun. 2025. “Shimglina Customary Conflict Resolution Mechanism for Rural Land Disputes in Ethiopia: The Practice and Challenges”. Pastures & Pastoralism, 03: 1-20. https://doi.org/10.33002/pp0301

ABSTRACTING LINKS
Crossref: https://doi.org/10.33002/pp0301
EuroPub:
Scilit:
Publons:
SSRN:
Cite Factor:
Academia.edu:
Dimensions:
ZENODO:
OpenAIRE:
Scribd:
ScienceGate:
J-Gate:
Research Gate:
Google Scholar:
Harvard Dataverse:
FAO-AGRIS:

ARCHIVE & REPOSITORY LINKS
Internet Archive:
WorldCat:

ARTICLE METRICS

© 2025 by the author(s). Licensee Grassroots Journal of Natural Resources. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). We allow to freely share (copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format) and adapt (remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially) with a legal code: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode.

Creative Commons Licence
Grassroots Journal of Natural Resources by The Grassroots Institute is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Based on a work at www.grassrootsjournals.org.

We support:

International Year of Rangelands and Pastoralists

    Editors

    Executive Chief Editor

    Dr. Hasrat Arjjumend

    President & CEO

    The Grassroots Institute, Canada

    Associate Editor

    Dr. Aayushi Malhotra

    Birla Institute of Technology and Sciences-Pilani, Rajasthan, India

    Dr. Hongxi Du

    Assistant Professor

    Hetao College, Linhe District, Bayannur City, Inner Mongoia, China

    Editorial Board

    * Dr. Hijaba Ykhanbai (Mongolia)

    * Dr. Saverio Krätli (Germany)

    * Dr. Ayman Balla Mustafa Yassien (Libya)

    * Dr. Nma Bida Alhaji (Nigeria)

    * Prof. Germana Henry Laswai (Tanzania)

    * Prof. Dr. Josiane Manirakiza (Burundi)

    * Dr. D. K. Sadana (India)

    * Mr. Kanna Kumar Siripurapu (India)

    * Dr. Smruti Smita Mohapatra (India)

    * Dr. Avik Ray (India)

    * Dr. Palden Tsering (China)

Share
Related Articles

Go to Top