Published By:
(ISSN: 2564-212X; CODEN: JPGOC8; DOI: 10.33002/jpg) is an international, scientific double blind peer-reviewed open access journal published 2 times a year online by The Grassroots Institute.
Open Access—free for readers, with article processing charges (APC) paid by authors or their institutions.
High Visibility: Indexed in HEIN. Indexing is proposed in the WoS, Scopus and other databases.
Time for Processing: Primary acceptance to the submitted article is given in 1 week time. After consent of author(s), manuscript is peer-reviewed, and a first decision provided to authors in 2-4 weeks after submission.
Recognition of Reviewers: The reviewers who provide timely, thorough peer-review reports receive vouchers entitling them to a discount on the APC of their next publication in the journal, in appreciation of the work done. Reviewers also receive Certificate for their voluntary service.
Journal of Policy & Governance is comprehensively covering the subjects of policy and governance in interdisciplinary and multidisciplinary approach. By bridging both academic and professional domains, the journal provides professionals, practitioners, researchers, students, and policymakers, and any other persons with information on developments in the field of policy and/or governance.
Jacob Dut Chol Riak
Department of Political Science, University of Juba, South Sudan. Email: dutsenior@yahoo.com
ORCID: https://orcid.org/000900340178612
Journal of Policy & Governance, 05(01) (June 2025), 16-38. https://doi.org/10.33002/jpg050102
Received: 20 January 2025
Published: 30 June 2025
Reviewed: 13 March 2025
Accepted: 15 April 2025
No. of Views:
No. of Paper Downloads:
The quest for institutional engineering in post-liberation South Sudan has been a dream for institutional engineers in political science and, particularly, comparative politics for a very long time. While many South Sudanese view decentralization and federalism as the same, the empirical literature and fieldwork carried out look at decentralization as a system of governance where powers at the national government are delegated to the sub-national levels of the government. Besides, federalism is discussed as the surrendering of powers at the national level to the sub-national levels of governments. The powers that are delegated can be taken back by the national government, while the powers surrendered cannot be taken back by the national level, except for the concurrent powers. This study argues that federalism and, particularly, territorial type, are the best institutional engineering for South Sudan. This was demonstrated by 60% of 200 respondents who emphasized that South Sudan should immediately adopt territorial federalism. Although other South Sudanese and their leaders associated federalism with Kokora, a Bari word for ‘division or divide’, this has not been the case from the literature review and discussions of the results. The majority of the respondents indicated that federalism is not associated with Kokora, as it is a concept of surrendering powers to the sub-national levels of governments. Hence, there is no fear of Kokora coming back to target the non-Equatorians as it was done in the 1980s. While the study used process-tracing and a case study of South Sudan as its methodology, it also used a mixed research design that enhanced qualitative as well as quantitative approaches. Although the study deployed a sampling technique of random and cluster sampling, it determined a sample size of 200 respondents, which is sufficient for concluding, it is crucial to conclude that federalism with a territorial type is urgently required for the case of South Sudan. The government should carry out civic education on territorial federalism, and it should be adopted immediately to chart the path of South Sudan to prosperity. While adopting territorial federalism for South Sudan, quality leadership is critical for this type of federalism to yield positive results.
Keywords: Decentralization; Federalism; Institutional engineering; Kokora; Post-liberation
Agok, D. (2014). Seeking a Solution for Acceptable Administration to the People of South Sudan.
Thesis, University of South Sudan, Juba
Armin, V., & Rudiger, W. (2024). The Principle of Vertical Separation of Powers: A Comparative
Overview of Legal Concepts and Structures. Max Planck Institute for Comparative Public Law and International Law, Heidelberg, Germany
Barry, B. (1975). The Consociational Model and its Dangers. European Journal of Political Research,
3(1), 393-412. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6765.1975.tb01253.x
Creswell, J., & Creswell, D. (2022). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative and Mixed Methods
Approaches. Sage Publications, Inc. Retrieved from: https://uk.sagepub.com/en-gb/eur/research-design/book270550
Dau, D. D. (2014). Decentralization Vis-a-Vis Federation. Sudan Tribune, 22 June 2014. Retrieved
Diamond, L. (1999). Developing Democracy: Toward Consolidation. John Hopkins University Press,
Baltimore, USA
Effendi, S., & Fatima, M. (2021). Right of Self-Determination and Kashmirs: A Conceptual
Understanding and Perspective. Orient Research Journal of Social Sciences, 6(1), 1-13. Retrieved from: https://shorturl.at/UvS9z
Garang, N. (2015). Breaking News: Son of a Governor and Member of National Security Service
Hague, R., & Harrop, M. (2010). Comparative Government and Politics. An Introduction (4th
Edition). Palgrave Macmillan, New York. Retrieved from: https://shorturl.at/6gfJA
Houlihan, S. (2015). Federal Systems Overview. Juba Forum of Federations.
Johnson, D. (2014). Federalism in the History of South Sudanese Political Thought. Rift Valley
Institute-Nairobi. Retrieved from: https://riftvalley.net/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/RVI-Research-Papers-Federalism-in-the-history-of-South-Sudanese-political-thought.pdf
Karim, J. (2014). Assessing Public Opinions Towards Federalism: What is the Proportion of South
Sudanese Who Favour Federalism? Unpublished Paper. University of Juba.
Kopling, P. (2020). Peaceful Coexistence: How Equatorians Got It. Retrieved from:
Lijphart, A. (1968). The Politics of Accumulation: Pluralism and Democracy in the Netherlands.
University of California Press, Berkeley and Los Angeles.
Lijphart, A. (1977). Democracy in Plural Societies: A Comparative Exploration. Yale University
Press.
Lupai, J. (2013). Kokora: Often Misunderstood, Grossly Misinterpreted and Most Feared. South
Mabek, S. (2015). Dr. Riek Machar’s Position on IGAD Draft Peace Agreement. DPF News.
Mabor, J. (2015). Administrative Decentralization: The Only Best Option for Governing South
Sudan. South Sudan Nation News.
Martin, J. (2022). Federalism: South Sudan in Dilemma. Juba Monitor News. Retrieved from:
Mayik, J. (2014). Why Federalism Must Wait? Sudan Tribune News. Retrieved from:
Mulla, R. (2014). South Sudan’s Federalism or Decentralization. South Sudan News Agency, 9 June
National Bureau of Statistics (2009). Statistical Yearbook for Southern Sudan 2009 | The Republic
Nyamilepedia (2015). South Sudan: Equatoria Community Position on The IGAD Peace Talks In
Addis Ababa. Retrieved from: https://nyamile.co/2015/02/21/14203/
Rabushka, A and Shepsle, K. (1972). Politics in Plural Societies: A Theory of Democratic Instability.
Charles E. Merrill Publishing Company.
Radio Tamazuj (2014). Kiir Raises Fears of Kokora Under Federal System. Juba News Cue.
Ramba, J. (2023). Federalism Now, Not Later. Juba Heights Publications.
Rens, W., & Deng, D. (2015). The Legacy of Kokora in South Sudan: Intersections of Truth, Justice
Riak, J. (2021). South Sudan State Formation: Failures, Shocks and Hopes. Africa World Book Press.
Riek, D. (2015). Decentralization: A Best Option of RoSS But Lacking Practicality. Universal
Printers.
Riker, W. (1964). Federalism: Origin, Operation and Significance. Boston: Little Brown and
Company.
Smith, L. (2023). Decolonizing Methodologies: Research and Indigenous Peoples. 3rd Edition.
Turton, D. (2006). Ethnic Federalism: The Ethiopian Experience in Comparative Perspective.
Oxford, James Curry Publishers.
UNMISS (2015). National Women Peace Dialogue at Nyakuron in Juba. Retrieved from:
Wawa, Y. (1992). Opening Address to the Abuja Peace Talks. Unpublished Document Collected.
Yamane, T. (1967). How to Calculate a Reliable Sample Size in Field Research. Harvard University
Riak, J. D. C. (2025). The Quest for Institutional Engineering in Post-Liberation South Sudan: Should it be Decentralization or Federalism? Journal of Policy & Governance, 05(01), 16-38. https://doi.org/10.33002/jpg050102
Riak, J. D. C. (2025). The Quest for Institutional Engineering in Post-Liberation South Sudan: Should it be Decentralization or Federalism? Journal of Policy & Governance, 05(01): 16-38. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33002/jpg050102
Riak J. D. C. The Quest for Institutional Engineering in Post-Liberation South Sudan: Should it be Decentralization or Federalism? Journal of Policy & Governance, 2025, 05 (01), 16-38. https://doi.org/10.33002/jpg050102
Riak, Jacob Dut Chol. 2025. “Flyrock: The “Hits” Just Keep On Coming!”. Journal of Policy & Governance, 05 no. 01: 16-38. https://doi.org/10.33002/jpg050102
Riak, Jacob Dut Chol. 2025. “Flyrock: The “Hits” Just Keep On Coming!”. Journal of Policy & Governance, 05 (01): 16-38. https://doi.org/10.33002/jpg050102
| Internet Archive: | https://archive.org/details/m-00548 |
| WorldCat: | https://search.worldcat.org/title/10920808531 |
© 2025 by the author(s). Licensee Journal of Policy & Governance. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). We allow to freely share (copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format) and adapt (remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially) with a legal code: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode.
Journal of Policy & Governance by The Grassroots Institute is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License based on a work at www.grassrootsjournals.org.
In Partnership with
Go to Top
