(ISSN 2564-016X; CODEN: JELPBQ; DOI: 10.33002) is an international, scientific double blind peer-reviewed open access journal published 3 times a year online by The Grassroots Institute.
Open Access—free for readers, with article processing charges (APC) paid by authors or their institutions.
High Visibility: Indexing is proposed in the WoS, Scopus and other databases.
Fast Publication: Primary acceptance to the submitted article is given in 1 week time. After consent of author(s), manuscript is peer-reviewed, and a first decision provided to authors in 2-4 weeks after submission.
Recognition of Reviewers: The reviewers who provide timely, thorough peer-review reports receive vouchers entitling them to a discount on the APC of their next publication in the journal, in appreciation of the work done. Reviewers also receive Certificate for their voluntary service.
Journal of Environmental Law and Policy is an international, interdisciplinary journal that facilitates an understanding of environmental governance, policy and law issues not only by drawing upon and contributing to the environmental social sciences, but also linking the ecosystem health, natural resources, and social sciences. The aim of the journal is to promote communication among academia, government, business and industry, civil society groups, citizens’ action groups, and non-governmental organizations who are instrumental in the solving of environmental problems and grassroots level issues.
Prospects and Challenges to Prove Environmental Harm in Litigation: Status Quo In Nigeria
Faculty of Law, University of Delta, Agbor, Nigeria.
Email: firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com | ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1179-3371
(2022) 02 (03) Journal of Environmental Law and Policy 139-153 https://doi.org/10.33002/jelp02.03.04
Received: 10 November 2022
Accepted: 13 November 2022
No. of Abstract Views:
Published: 28 December 2022
No. of Paper Downloads:
Environmental litigation and enforcement of environmental rights remain a global challenge to sustainability, especially in developing countries such as Nigeria. The increasing rates of industrial activities have led to increase in production of hazardous substances posing threat to lives of the inhabitants of the environment. Victims of environmental harm most times find it difficult to protect and enforce their environmental rights. Proving environmental harm such as damages to property in litigation to enforce rights of compensation or restoration for damages suffered becomes difficult due to locus standi technicalities and undue delays during trials. Sometimes victims are faced with financial constraint in pursuing the course of justice which involves retaining the services of a lawyer and expert witnesses. This paper, therefore, examines the prospects and challenges to proving environmental harm in litigation. This paper employs doctrinal legal research methodology and content analysis of both primary and secondary sources in relation to proving environmental harm in litigation. On this premise, this paper recommends the application of the principle of Res Ipsa Loquitur in trials of environmental cases. Proving environmental harm for the enforcement of environmental rights by victims, should be totally devoid of technicalities of law during trials. This will in turn promote the course of justice in cases dealing with environmental harm.
Keywords: Environmental harm; Challenges; Litigation; Compensation; Locus standi
Adamu Kyuka Usman, ‘Environmental Protection Law and Practice’, Ababa Press Ltd., Nigeria
Awodezi Henry and EruteyaUgiomo, ‘Environmental Law Litigation and its Remedial
Caxton Legal Centre Inc.,‘Environmental Harm’ (2016), as cited by Cleverline, T. B. and
Cleverline, T. B. and Nlerum, S. O., ‘Redressing Harmful Environmental Practices in the
Cranston, M., ‘Human Right; Real and Supposed in Raphael (eds) Political Theory and the
Rights of a Man’ Blooming, 1967, 52
Ebeku, K., ‘Judicial Attitudes to Redress for Oil Related Damages in Nigeria’, (2003) 12 (2)
Eguh, E. C., ‘Regulations of Trans-boundary Movements of Hazardous Wastes, Lessons from
Ekhator, E. O., ‘Improving Access to Environmental Justice Under the African Charter on
Etemire, U., ‘The Future of Climate Change Litigation in Nigeria: COPW v. NNPC in the
Spotlight’, (2021) CCLR (2) 159
Fagbemi, S. A. and Akpanke, A. R.,‘Environmental Litigation in Nigeria: The Role of the
Judiciary’, (2019) 4, <www.ajol.info>article>view> accessed 25 September 2022
Environmental Court of Justice’ (2016), www.foei.org accessed 23 August 2018
Hughes, D., ’Environmental Law’, (2003) 14 (1) Management of Environmental Quality 162,
Michael Uche Ukponu, ‘Environmental Law and Access to Justice in Nigeria: A Case for a
Mistura, A., ‘Is There Space for Environmental Crimes Under International Criminal Law? The
Oko, O.‘Seeking Justice in Transitional Societies: An Analysis of the Problems and Failures of
Okorodudu, M. T., ‘Law of Environmental Protection’ (1998) Text C., as cited by Ebeku, K.,
Omorogbe, Y., ‘TheGrowthofEnvironmentalLaw in Developing Countries: Problems and
Orlando, E. and Bergin, T., ‘Forging a Socio-Legal Approach to Environmental Harms: Global
Perspective’ Routledge (2017) 3
Osho-AdejonwoOluwatoyin, ‘The Evolution of Human Rights Approaches to Environmental
Protection in Nigeria’ (2005) OptiocomDocumans& Task, www.iucnael.org/index.php? accessed 12 March 2010
Peter, C.M., ‘Taking Environment’ (1993) 3 Revenue Africaine des Drroits de 1, Homme, 42
Popoola, E. O., ‘Appraisal of the Contemporary Jurisprudence on the Right to Environment: A
Case Study of Nigeria and South Africa’ Ahmadu Bello University, (2016), 390
Popoola, E. O., ‘Moving the Battlefields: Foreign Jurisdictions and Environmental Justice in
Nigeria’ (2017), kujenga-amani.ssrc.org accessed 24 September 2022
White, R. and Heckenberg, D., ‘Green Criminology: An Introduction to the Study of
Environmental Harm’ Routledge (2014) 348
White, R., ‘The Criminalization of Environmental Harm: Rob White Explores How
Awodezi Henry, ‘Prospects and Challenges to Prove Environmental Harm in Litigation: Status Quo In Nigeria’ (2022) 02 (03) Journal of Environmental Law & Policy 139-153 https://doi.org/10.33002/jelp02.03.04
Henry,A. (2022). Prospects and Challenges to Prove Environmental Harm in Litigation: Status Quo In Nigeria. Journal of Environmental Law and Policy, 02(03): 139-153. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33002/jelp02.03.04
Henry, A. (2022). Prospects and Challenges to Prove Environmental Harm in Litigation: Status Quo In Nigeria. Journal of Environmental Law and Policy, 02(03), 139-153. https://doi.org/10.33002/jelp02.03.04
Henry A. Prospects and Challenges to Prove Environmental Harm in Litigation: Status Quo In Nigeria. Journal of Environmental Law and Policy, 2022, 02(03), 139-153. https://doi.org/10.33002/jelp02.03.04
Henry,Awodezi. 2022.“Prospects and Challenges to Prove Environmental Harm in Litigation: Status Quo In Nigeria”. Journal of Environmental Law and Policy, 02 no. 03: 139-153. https://doi.org/10.33002/jelp02.03.04
Henry,Awodezi. 2022.“Prospects and Challenges to Prove Environmental Harm in Litigation: Status Quo In Nigeria”. Journal of Environmental Law and Policy, 02(03): 139-153. https://doi.org/10.33002/jelp02.03.04
© 2022 by the author(s). Licensee Journal of Environmental Law and Policy. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). We allow to freely share (copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format) and adapt (remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially) with a legal code: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode.
Journal of Environmental Law and Policy by The Grassroots Institute is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License based on a work at www.grassrootsjournals.org.
Go to Top