(ISSN 2564-016X; CODEN: JELPBQ; DOI: 10.33002) is an international, scientific double blind peer-reviewed open access journal published 3 times a year online by The Grassroots Institute.
Open Access—free for readers, with article processing charges (APC) paid by authors or their institutions.
High Visibility: Indexing is proposed in the WoS, Scopus and other databases.
Fast Publication: Primary acceptance to the submitted article is given in 1 week time. After consent of author(s), manuscript is peer-reviewed, and a first decision provided to authors in 2-4 weeks after submission.
Recognition of Reviewers: The reviewers who provide timely, thorough peer-review reports receive vouchers entitling them to a discount on the APC of their next publication in the journal, in appreciation of the work done. Reviewers also receive Certificate for their voluntary service.
Journal of Environmental Law and Policy is an international, interdisciplinary journal that facilitates an understanding of environmental governance, policy and law issues not only by drawing upon and contributing to the environmental social sciences, but also linking the ecosystem health, natural resources, and social sciences. The aim of the journal is to promote communication among academia, government, business and industry, civil society groups, citizens’ action groups, and non-governmental organizations who are instrumental in the solving of environmental problems and grassroots level issues.
Cláudia Sofia Guerreiro Martins*
Institute for the Conservation of Neotropical Carnivores, Atibaia, SP, Brazil; Center for Ecology & Environmental Monitoring, Federal University of São Francisco Valley, Petrolina, PE, Brazil.
Email: email@example.com | ORCID: 0000-0003-3528-0877
Institute for the Conservation of Neotropical Carnivores, Atibaia, SP, Brazil.
Email: firstname.lastname@example.org | ORCID: 0000-0001-6652-7305
Carolina Franco Esteves
Institute for the Conservation of Neotropical Carnivores, Atibaia, SP, Brazil.
Email: email@example.com | ORCID: 0000-0003-4564-4101
University of São Paulo, Forestry Science Department, Wildlife Ecology, Management and Conservation Laboratory, Piracicaba, SP, Brazil; Wildlife Conservation Research Unit, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Email: firstname.lastname@example.org | ORCID: 0000-0002-8184-1631
* Corresponding Author
Journal of Environmental Law and Policy (2021) 01(02), 80-102. https://doi.org/10.33002/jelp01.02.04
Accepted: 17 August 2021
No. of Abstract Views:
Published: 31 August 2021
No. of Paper Downloads:
Exclusively Brazilian, the Caatinga is a seasonally dry tropical forest where the endangered jaguar (Panthera onca) and puma (Puma concolor) co-occur with the lowest regional Human Development Indexes. New land uses challenge traditional livelihoods and add threats to species historically poached in retaliation for livestock depredation. Chronicle biodiversity conflicts became acute after a reported increase in depredation allegedly because of those changes and conflicts among stakeholders. Using the framework of human dimensions of wildlife management, pioneer research on the vulnerabilities of rural communities to jaguar-and-puma conflicts was led in ‘Boqueirão da Onça’, within and surrounding that polygon of protected areas. The aim was to identify, describe, understand, and predict human behaviour, and link the outcomes with the IUCN natural resources governance concept. Negative attitudes arose from 72% and 35.2% participants towards the proximity of jaguar and proximity of puma, respectively. When asked about institutions working for wildlife protection, and institutions working for people facing problems caused by carnivores, 64.9% and 88.8%, respectively, were unaware of them. Regarding beliefs about co-occurrence with jaguars or pumas, 80.9% and 82.9%, respectively, mentioned more problems than benefits, with 74.5% believing in the increase of both species’ populations due to the creation of protected areas. This scenario may ease jaguar and puma to become scapegoats for human-wildlife and broader social conflicts, unless values such as justice and transparency are pursued.
Keywords: Biodiversity conflicts; Human dimensions; Protected areas; Governance
Andrade M C, A Terra e o Homem No Nordeste (1998) Editora Universitaria UFPE
Azevedo F C, and others, ‘Avaliação Do Risco de Extinção Da Onça-Parda Puma Concolor
Baird T D, Leslie P W, and McCabe J T, ‘The Effect of Wildlife Conservation on Local
Borrini G, and others, ‘Governance of Protected Areas: From Understanding to Action.’ (2013)
Brandon K E, and Wells M, ‘Planning for People and Parks: Design Dilemmas’ (1992) 20 World
Brookfield H C, ‘On the Environment as Perceived’ (1969) 1 Progress in Geography:
Campos C B, and others, ‘Medium and Large Sized Mammals of the Boqueirão Da Onça, North
da Silva J M C, and others, Caatinga (José Maria Cardoso da Silva, Inara R Leal and Marcelo
Desbiez A, Paula R C, and Cavalcanti S, ‘Plano de Ação Nacional Para a Conservação Da Onça-
de Queiroz L P, and others, Caatinga (José Maria Cardoso da Silva, Inara R Leal and Marcelo
Dias, D M and others, ‘Human Activities Influence the Occupancy Probability of Mammalian
Dillman D A, Mail and Internet Surveys: The Tailored Design Method (2nd Ed.): 2007 Update with
Elbroch L M, and Wittmer H U, ‘Table Scraps: Inter-Trophic Food Provisioning by Pumas’
Fonseca C R, and others, Caatinga (José Maria Cardoso da Silva, Inara R Leal and Marcelo
Fowler Jr. F J, Survey Research Methods, 2nd Ed. (Sage Publications, Inc 1993)
Frank B, ‘Human–Wildlife Conflicts and the Need to Include Tolerance and Coexistence: An
Fioravanti C, ‘A Corrosão Da Caatinga’ (2018) 266 Revista Pesquisa Fapesp 60.
Herrmann T M, and others, ‘Values, Animal Symbolism, and Human-Animal Relationships
Holland K K, Larson L R, and Robert B Powell, ‘Characterizing Conflict between Humans and
ICMBio, ‘Sumário Executivo Do Plano De Ação Nacional Para a Conservação Da Onça-Parda’
Kahneman D, ‘Pensar Depressa e Devagar’ (2012) Maia: Círculo de Leitores
Kansky R, and Knight A T, ‘Key Factors Driving Attitudes towards Large Mammals in Conflict
Karanth K U, and Chellam R, ‘Carnivore Conservation at the Crossroads’ (2009) 43 Oryx 1
Lozano J, and others, ‘Human-Carnivore Relations: A Systematic Review’ (2019) 237 Biological
Marchini S, ‘Who’s in Conflict with Whom? Human Dimensions of the Conflicts Involving
Mazzolli M, Graipel M E, and Dunstone N, ‘Mountain Lion Depredation in Southern Brazil’
Mech L D, ‘A New Era for Carnivore Conservation’ (1996) 24 Wildlife Society Bulletin (1973-
Miller T R, Minteer B A, and Malan L-C, ‘The New Conservation Debate: The View from
Newing H, Conducting Research in Conservation: Social Science Methods and Practice (Routledge,
Nyhus P J, ‘Human–Wildlife Conflict and Coexistence’ (2016) 41 Annual Review of
Oates J F, Myth and Reality in the Rain Forest: How Conservation Strategies Are Failing in West Africa
Oliveira G, and others, ‘Conserving the Brazilian Semiarid (Caatinga) Biome under Climate
Palmeira F B L, and Barrella W, ‘Conflitos Causados Pela Predação de Rebanhos Domésticos
Phillips A, ‘Turning Ideas on Their Head: The New Paradigm For Protected Areas’ (2003) 20
Ripple W J, and Beschta R L, ‘Linking a Cougar Decline, Trophic Cascade, and Catastrophic
Salant P, and Dillman D A, How to Conduct Your Own Survey (1994)
Seddon W R, and others, ‘Sensitivity of Global Terrestrial Ecosystems to Climate Variability’
Stern M J, ‘The Power of Trust: Toward a Theory of Local Opposition to Neighboring Protected
Susskind L, and Cruikshank J, Breaking the Impasse: Consensual Approaches to Resolving Public
Warren C R, and others, ‘“Green On Green”: Public Perceptions of Wind Power in Scotland and
Zimmermann A, and others, ‘Contemporary Views of Human-Carnivore Conflicts on Wild
Cláudia S G Martins, Francine Schulz, Carolina F Esteves and Silvio Marchini, ‘Jaguar and Puma in Brazilian Semi-Arid Region – scapegoats for weak governance?’ (2021) 01(02) Journal of Environmental Law & Policy 80-102. https://doi.org/10.33002/jelp01.02.04
Martins, C.S.G., Schulz, F., Esteves, C.F. and Marchini, S. (2021). Jaguar and Puma in Brazilian Semi-Arid Region – scapegoats for weak governance? Journal of Environmental Law and Policy, 01(02): 80-102. Doi: https://doi.org/10.33002/jelp01.02.04
Martins, C.S.G., Schulz, F., Esteves, C.F., & Marchini, S. (2021). Jaguar and Puma in Brazilian Semi-Arid Region – scapegoats for weak governance? Journal of Environmental Law and Policy, 01(02), 80-102. https://doi.org/10.33002/jelp01.02.04
Martins C.S.G., Schulz F., Esteves C.F., Marchini S. Jaguar and Puma in Brazilian Semi-Arid Region – scapegoats for weak governance? Journal of Environmental Law and Policy, 2021, 01 (02), 80-102. https://doi.org/10.33002/jelp01.02.04
Martins, Cláudia Sofia Guerreiro, Schulz, Francine, Esteves, Carolina Franco, Marchini, Silvio. 2021. “Jaguar and Puma in Brazilian Semi-Arid Region – scapegoats for weak governance?” Journal of Environmental Law and Policy, 01 no.02: 80-102. https://doi.org/10.33002/jelp01.02.04
Martins, Cláudia Sofia Guerreiro, Francine Schulz, Carolina Franco Esteves and Silvio Marchini. 2021. “Jaguar and Puma in Brazilian Semi-Arid Region – scapegoats for weak governance?” Journal of Environmental Law and Policy, 01 (02): 80-102. https://doi.org/10.33002/jelp01.02.04
© 2021 by the author(s). Licensee Journal of Environmental Law and Policy. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). We allow to freely share (copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format) and adapt (remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially) with a legal code: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode.
Journal of Environmental Law and Policy by The Grassroots Institute is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License based on a work at www.grassrootsjournals.org.
Go to Top