Published By:
(ISSN:2581-6853; CODEN: GJNRA9; DOI: 10.33002/nr2581.6853) is an international, scientific double blind peer-reviewed open access journal published 3 times a year online by The Grassroots Institute.
Impact Factor: exaly
Open Access—free for readers, with article processing charges (APC) paid by authors or their institutions.
High Visibility: Indexed in Web of Science (Zoological Record, Biosis Previews, Biological Abstracts, Biosis Full Coverage Unique, and CAB Abstracts), EBSCO and other databases.
Time for Processing: Provisional acceptance of the submitted article is given in 1 week time. After consent of author(s), manuscript is peer-reviewed and a first decision provided to authors in 2-4 weeks after submission.
Recognition of Reviewers: The reviewers who provide timely, thorough peer-review reports receive vouchers entitling them to a discount on the APC of their next publication in the journal, in appreciation of the work done. Reviewers also receive Certificate for their voluntary service.
Coordinated and published by The Grassroots Institute, the Grassroots Journal of Natural Resources (GJNR) is an international journal dedicated to the latest advancements in natural resources throughout the world. The goal of this journal is to provide a platform for scientists, social scientists, policy analysts, managers and practitioners (on all academic and professional levels) all over the world to promote, discuss and share various new issues and developments in different arenas of natural resources.
The Historical Roots of Assam-Nagaland Border Disputes and Their Impact on Forest Resources
Bhrigumoni Nath1, Vulli Dhanaraju*2
1Department of History, Assam University, Diphu Campus, Assam, India.
Email: bhrigunath.nath418@gmail.com | ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0000-7835-0885
2Department of History, North-Eastern Hill University (NEHU), Shillong, Meghalaya, India.
Email: vullidhanaraju@gmail.com | ORCID: http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5559-1077
*Corresponding author
Grassroots Journal of Natural Resources, 8(2): 754-774. Doi: https://doi.org/10.33002/nr2581.6853.080235
Received: 25 March 2025
Reviewed: 16 August 2025
Provisionally Accepted: 17 August 2025
Revised: 18 August 2025
Finally Accepted: 20 August 2025
Published: 30 August 2025
The Assam-Nagaland border dispute, rooted in colonial policies and ambiguous land demarcations, has led to persistent conflicts and significant environmental degradation, particularly affecting forest resources critical to tribal livelihoods. This study investigates the historical origins of this dispute and its socio-economic and ecological impacts, emphasizing the need for clear land titling and community-driven conservation to ensure sustainable resource management and regional stability. By analyzing colonial interventions and their lasting effects, the research highlights how unresolved territorial claims continue to undermine effective governance and threaten biodiversity in the border region. Employing qualitative methods, data were collected through semi-structured interviews with 16 purposively selected stakeholders from five border villages, representing diverse tribal communities, supplemented by archival records, government reports, and media sources from 2021–2025. Findings reveal that colonial policies, notably the Treaty of Yandaboo (1826) and the Indian Forest Act (1878), disrupted communal land systems, creating ambiguous boundaries that intensified after Nagaland’s formation in 1963. Stakeholders reported that unclear land ownership fuels violent clashes, such as the 1985 Merapani incident (over 100 deaths), with Nagaland’s alleged encroachment of 66,241 hectares, including 17,500 hectares forest land, driving deforestation. Field observations and interviews confirmed a 55.71% loss of common property resources (1,401,184.8 acres) from 1947–2000, leading to biodiversity decline. The nexus between border disputes and forest management is evident in competing agrarian claims, with Assam’s settlement policies and Nagaland’s infrastructure expansion exacerbating resource depletion. The study implies that unresolved territorial disputes undermine sustainable forest governance, threatening tribal livelihoods. It concludes that addressing colonial legacies through clear land titling and participatory boundary demarcation is essential.
Border dispute; Colonialism; Forest resources; Assam-Nagaland; Land alienation
ALAP (1978). Assam Legislative Assembly Proceedings. A statement by Chief Minister Golap Borbora.
Government of Assam, India.
Barpujari, H.K. (1992). The Comprehensive History of Assam. Vol II. Guwahati, India: Assam Publication
Board.
Borah, S. (1978). Bidrohar Pratiddhani. Golaghat, India: Self Publication.
Boro, Y.K. and Kakoti, D. (2024). Sub-National border conflict between Assam and Nagaland: A case
study of Uriamghat. Library Progress International, 44(3): 7314–7328. DOI: https://doi.org/10.48165/bapas.2024.44.2.1.
Dainik Janambhumi. (2011, August 13). Seema vivadar samasyar samadhan ketia. Dainik Janambhumi.
Das, T. and Sarma, A. (2014). Nagaland-Assam Border Dispute: Past Perspective. Newslaundry.
Available online at: https://tinyurl.com/5n6v4tm9 (accessed on 9 September 2024).
Dowerah, S. (2014). How the Assam-Nagaland border dispute became a people versus history problem.
Firstpost. Available online at: https://tinyurl.com/55advm9u (accessed on 01 August 2025).
Down to Earth (2024). Assam’s Forests on the Brink: Urgent Action Needed to Prevent Environmental
Collapse. Down to Earth. Available online at: https://tinyurl.com/y8eksvwf (accessed on 22 October 2024).
Farnandes, W. and Barbora, S. (2008). Land, People and Politics: Contest over Tribal Land in Northeast
India. Guwahati, India: North Eastern Social Research Centre (NESRC).
Franke, M. (2009). War and Nationalism in South Asia: The Indian State and the Nagas. London:
Routledge.
Gait, E.A. (2013). A History of Assam. Guwahati, India: EBH Publishers (Reprint, originally published
1906).
Gogoi, D. (2019). Frontier, border, and territorial state. In: D. Gogoi (ed.), Making of India's Northeast:
Gogoi, L. (1983). Beli Mar Gal. Calcutta, India: Sribhumi Publishing Company.
Goswami, B.N. (2017). Political Ecology of Deforestation and Tribal Life. New Delhi: Concept
Publication.
Handique, R. (2004). British Forest Policy in Assam. New Delhi: Concept Publication.
Hunter, W.W. (1975). A Statistical Account of Assam (Vol. II). London: Trubner & Co (Reprint,
originally published 1879).
Hussain, J. (2004). Doyangar Andolon: Kichu Purani Kotha. Dainik Janambhumi, June 19. Available
online at: https://s2.dainikjanambhumi.co.in/ (accessed on 01 August 2025).
Kikon, D. (2008). Ethnography of the Nagaland-Assam Foothills in Northeast India. In: W. Fernandes
and S. Barbora (eds.), Land, People and Politics: Contest over Tribal Land in Northeast India, p.58–88. Guwahati, India: North Eastern Social Research Centre (NESRC).
Kindo, C. and Minj, D. (2008). Impact of Assam-Nagaland territorial dispute in the district of Golaghat,
Konyak, N.N. (2016). Assam-Nagaland Border Dispute: Need for a New Framework. Third Concept,
April: 53–54.
Lannusosang, T. (1987). Nagaland: A Study in Social Geography. Unpublished Thesis. Guwahati, India:
Gauhati University.
Mahanta, S. (2024). Understanding The Border Disputes of Northeast India: Special Emphasis on Assam
Makenzie, A. (1979). The North East Frontier of India. New Delhi: Mittal Publications (Reprint,
originally published 1884).
Misra, U. (2014). Assam-Nagaland Border Violence. Economic and Political Weekly, 49(38).
Ribbentrop, B. (1989). Forestry in British India. New Delhi: Indus Publishing Company (Reprint,
originally published 1900).
Rumley, D. and Minghi, J.V. (Eds.). (1991). The Geography of Border Landscapes. New York:
Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315746593.
Saikia, A. (2008a). Forest land and peasant struggles in Assam, 2002–2007. Journal of Peasant Studies,
35(1): 39–59. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03066150801983402.
Saikia, A. (2008b). State, peasants, and land reclamation: The predicament of forest conservation in
Assam, 1850s–1980s. Indian Economic & Social History Review, 45(4): 453–482. DOI:
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/001946460704500103.
Stracey, P.D. (1953). Notes on Forest Industries for Assam. Shillong, India: Assam Government Press.
Sundaram, K.V.K. (1976). Report of the Advisor K.V.K. Sundaram on the Assam-Nagaland Boundary.
Ministry of Home Affairs, Government of India, New Delhi.
The Indian Express. (2007). Nagaland CM TR Zeliang expresses hope for broad-based consultations to
facilitate resolution of Naga political problem. The Indian Express, August 13. Available online at: https://tinyurl.com/yjef8mzn (accessed on 01 August 2025).
The Oriental Times (1999). Assam-Nagaland border dispute. The Oriental Times, 2(9-10): 228. Oxford:
Basil Blackwell.
The Statesman (2017). The Naga question. The Statesman, January 9. Available online at:
https://www.thestatesman.com/features/the-naga-question-1483948491.html (accessed on 01 August 2025).
The Times of India (2013). Assam-Nagaland meeting on border row. The Times of India, June 10.
Available online at: https://tinyurl.com/4vzcbmm3 (accessed on 01 August 2025).
Zee News (2011). Interview with Dr. H. Sarmah, spokesperson and Minister of the Government of
Assam. Zee News, November 18. https://www.zeenews.com
Nath, B. and Dhanaraju, V. (2025). The Historical Roots of Assam-Nagaland Border Disputes and Their Impact on Forest Resources. Grassroots Journal of Natural Resources, 8(2): 754-774. Doi: https://doi.org/10.33002/nr2581.6853.080235
Nath, B., & Dhanaraju, V. (2025). The Historical Roots of Assam-Nagaland Border Disputes and Their Impact on Forest Resources. Grassroots Journal of Natural Resources, 8(2), 754-774. https://doi.org/10.33002/nr2581.6853.080235
Nath B., Dhanaraju V. The Historical Roots of Assam-Nagaland Border Disputes and Their Impact on Forest Resources. Grassroots Journal of Natural Resources, 2025, 8 (2), 754-774. https://doi.org/10.33002/nr2581.6853.080235
Nath, Bhrigumoni, Dhanaraju, Vulli. 2025. “The Historical Roots of Assam-Nagaland Border Disputes and Their Impact on Forest Resources”. Grassroots Journal of Natural Resources, 8 no. 2: 754-774. https://doi.org/10.33002/nr2581.6853.080235
Nath, Bhrigumoni and Vulli Dhanaraju. 2025. “The Historical Roots of Assam-Nagaland Border Disputes and Their Impact on Forest Resources”. Grassroots Journal of Natural Resources, 8 (2): 754-774. https://doi.org/10.33002/nr2581.6853.080235
| Internet Archive: | https://archive.org/details/m-00584_202602 |
| WorldCat: | https://search.worldcat.org/title/10968367176 |
© 2025 by the author(s). Licensee Grassroots Journal of Natural Resources. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). We allow to freely share (copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format) and adapt (remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially) with a legal code: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode.
Grassroots Journal of Natural Resources by The Grassroots Institute is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Based on a work at www.grassrootsjournals.org.
Go to Top
