Published By:
(ISSN:2581-6853; CODEN: GJNRA9; DOI: 10.33002/nr2581.6853) is an international, scientific double blind peer-reviewed open access journal published 3 times a year online by The Grassroots Institute.
Impact Factor: exaly
Open Access—free for readers, with article processing charges (APC) paid by authors or their institutions.
High Visibility: Indexed in Web of Science (Zoological Record, Biosis Previews, Biological Abstracts, Biosis Full Coverage Unique, and CAB Abstracts), EBSCO and other databases.
Time for Processing: Provisional acceptance of the submitted article is given in 1 week time. After consent of author(s), manuscript is peer-reviewed and a first decision provided to authors in 2-4 weeks after submission.
Recognition of Reviewers: The reviewers who provide timely, thorough peer-review reports receive vouchers entitling them to a discount on the APC of their next publication in the journal, in appreciation of the work done. Reviewers also receive Certificate for their voluntary service.
Coordinated and published by The Grassroots Institute, the Grassroots Journal of Natural Resources (GJNR) is an international journal dedicated to the latest advancements in natural resources throughout the world. The goal of this journal is to provide a platform for scientists, social scientists, policy analysts, managers and practitioners (on all academic and professional levels) all over the world to promote, discuss and share various new issues and developments in different arenas of natural resources.
Gamifying Environmental Law: Strategizing Engagement and Compliance through Innovative Strategies
Reshma Suresh*1, Saiji Jayakumar Sujatha2, Nikhil Gopikuttan3
1VIT School of Law, Vellore Institute of Technology, Chennai, India.
Email: reshma.suresh@vit.ac.in | ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0006-7160-3177
2VIT School of Law, Vellore Institute of Technology, Chennai, India. Email: saiji.js@vit.ac.in
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0001-3743-7041
3VIT School of Law, Vellore Institute of Technology, Chennai, India. Email: nikhil.g@vit.ac.in
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0003-7877-3513
*Corresponding author
Grassroots Journal of Natural Resources, 8(2): 342-357. Doi: https://doi.org/10.33002/nr2581.6853.080217
Received: 25 April 2025
Reviewed: 15 June 2025
Provisionally Accepted: 19 June 2025
Revised: 26 June 2025
Finally Accepted: 05 July 2025
Published: 25 August 2025
Environmental law has struggled long with concerns of public non-participation, inefficient enforcement, and compliance mechanisms. The paper suggests the use of gamification as a tool for public engagement. It is based on the core idea that engagement with a subject matter can be significantly increased when it is presented through interactive, game-like experiences. When this is applied to environmental law, something that is often met with challenges because of its complex and abstract language and ineffective enforcement mechanisms, it is able to create an immersive learning and compliance experience that is equally impactful and memorable. Reflecting on psychological theories such as Self-Determination Theory, the Theory of Planned Behaviour, Goal Framing Theory, Octalysis framework, Behavioural economics, and social cognitive theory, the paper explains how gamification fosters autonomy, competence, social influence, and intrinsic motivation, which are all vital for sustained behavioural change that becomes quintessential for successful environmental regulation models. By leveraging technology, behavioural insights, and game theory, gamification fosters a culture of environmental governance, empowering individuals and institutions to become active participants in sustainability. Gamification increases the possibility of voluntary complying in line with environmental regulations by strategic enhancement of legal framework and duties. The paper, thus, argues for a paradigm shift in how environmental legal frameworks are researched, taught, communicated, and implemented, leveraging gamification as a strategic and transformative tool in green governance.
Gamification; Environmental law; Compliance; Strategic; Governance
Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision
Processes, 50(2): 179–211. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T.
Alzahrani, A.I., Mahmud, I., Ramayah, T., Alfarraj, O. and Alalwan, N. (2017). Extending the Theory of
Planned Behavior (TPB) to explain online game playing among Malaysian undergraduate students. Telematics and Informatics, 34(4): 239–251. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2016.07.001.
Amadori, G. (2020). Video games for environmental communication: Raising awareness through sandbox
games and streamers. Comunicación y Sociedad, 3: 391–404.
Amriani, A., Aji, A.F., Utomo, A.Y. and Junus, K.M. (2013). An empirical study of gamification impact
on e-learning environment. In Proceedings of the 2013 3rd International Conference on Computer Science and Network Technology. IEEE, October, 265–269.
Bacharach, M. and Hurley, S. (2001). The framing of games and the psychology of play. Games and
Economic Behavior, 73(2): 459–469. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geb.2010.12.007.
Bassanelli, S., Vasta, N., Bucchiarone, A. and Marconi, A. (2022). Gamification for behavior change: A
scientometric review. Acta Psychologica, 228: 103657. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2022.103657.
Beerda, J. (2021). The Octalysis framework: The power of behavioral science behind gamification. The
Octalysis Group. Available online at: https://tinyurl.com/42vrwt3u (accessed on 4 May 2025).
Castaneda, S. (2024). Playing for the planet: Gamification as a tool for environmental engagement. The
Decision Lab. Available online at: https://tinyurl.com/27s854pj [accessed on 8 April 2025].
Castaneda, S. (2024). Playing for the planet: Gamification as a tool for environmental engagement. The
Decision Lab,Available online at: https://tinyurl.com/27s854pj [accessed on 4 May 2025].
Chappin, E.J.L., Bijvoet, X. and Oei, A. (2017). Teaching sustainability to a broad audience through an
entertainment game – The effect of Catan: Oil Springs. Journal of Cleaner Production, 156: 556–568.
Chen, C.M., Li, M. and Kuo, C.P. (2023). A game-based learning system based on Octalysis gamification
framework to promote employees Japanese learning, Computers & Education, 205: 104899. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2023.104899.
Chen, C.M., Ming-Chaun, L. and Kuo, C.P. (2023). A Game-Based Learning System Based on Octalysis
Gamification Framework to Promote Employees Japanese Learning. Computers & Education, 205 (4): 104899. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2023.104899.
Chen, J., He, M., Chen, J. and Zhang, C. (2024). Exploring the role and mechanisms of environmental
serious games in promoting pro-environmental decision-making: a focused literature review and future research agenda. Frontiers in Psychology, 15: 1455005. DOI:
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1455005.
Chou, Y.K. (2025). Gamification research: How Farmville used black hat motivation to drive short-term
behaviour. Available online at: https://tinyurl.com/yt46trhj [accessed on 4 May 2025].
De Freitas, S. (2006). Learning in immersive worlds: A review of game-based learning. Bristol: Joint
Information Systems Committee (JISC).
De Freitas, S. (2006). Learning in immersive worlds: A review of game-based learning. Bristol: Joint
Information Systems Committee.
Devarhubli, G., Kashyap, A.K. and Tomar, A.S. (2025). Interdisciplinarity Research in Sustainability: A
15 Year Bibliometric Analysis of Sustainability Journal. Grassroots Journal of Natural Resources, 8(1): 209–240. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33002/nr2581.6853.080108.
Devarhubli, G., Kashyap, A.K. and Tomar, A.S. (2025). Interdisciplinarity Research in Sustainability: A
15 Year Bibliometric Analysis of Sustainability. Grassroots Journal of Natural Resources, 8(1): 209–240. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33002/nr2581.6853.080108.
Dichev, C. and Dicheva, D. (2017). Gamifying education: what is known, what is believed and what
remains uncertain: a critical review. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 14(1): 9.
Dondlinger, M.J. (2007). Educational video game design: A review of the literature. Journal of Applied
Educational Technology, 4(1): 21–31.
Dondlinger, M.J. (2007). Educational video game design: A review of the literature. Journal of Applied
Educational Technology, 4(1): 21–31.
Douglas, B.D. and Brauer, M. (2021). Gamification to prevent climate change: A review of games and
apps for sustainability. Current Opinion in Psychology, 42: 89–94.
Elya, R. (2023). Gamification in immersive learning: A path to engaging and effective learning. Available
online at: https://tinyurl.com/msbcj45p [accessed on 17 May 2025].
Evans, C. (2013). Making sense of assessment feedback in higher education. Review of Educational
Research, 83(1): 70–120.
Ferguson, D.M. (2016). The gamification of legal education: Why games transcend the Langdellian
model and how they can revolutionize law school. Chapman Law Review, 19: 629.
Fernández-Ruano, M.L. (2022). The use of gamification in environmental interpretation and its effect on
customer-based destination brand equity: The moderating role of psychological distance. Journal of Destination Marketing and Management, 23: 100677. DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdmm.2021.100677.
Hennig, B.D., Roberts, B.F., Welling, J.T., Pinal, M. and Ólafsson, J. (2025). Playing for the planet? A
serious game approach to land use planning with students in rural Iceland. Societies, 15(1): 14.
Hsu, C.L. (2025). Environmental sustainability gamification: Conceptualization and scale development.
Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 212: 123978. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2025.123978.
Huber, G.P. (1991). Organizational learning: The contributing processes and the literatures. Organization
Science, 2(1): 88–115.
Science, 2(1): 88–115.
training and education. San Francisco, CA: John Wiley & Sons.
Kelk, N., Luscombe, G.M., Medlow, S. and Hickie, I.B. (2009). Courting the blues: Attitudes towards
depression in Australian law students and legal practitioners. Sydney: Brain & Mind Research Institute.
Khrushch, O. (2021). Globalization, greed and glocal ecology: A psychological perspective. Grassroots
Journal of Natural Resources, 4(3): 1–12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33002/nr2581.6853.040301.
Klimmt, C. (2009). Serious games and social change: Why they (should) work. In: Ritterfeld, U., Cody,
M. and Vorderer, P. (eds.), Serious games: Mechanisms and effects. New York: Routledge, 248–270. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203891650.
Knutas, A., Hauge, J.B. and Petersen, S.A. (2018). Gamification at work: Employee motivations to
participate and preferences for energy conservation. Proceedings of the Mediterranean Conference on Information Systems (MCIS 2018). Available online at: https://aisel.aisnet.org/mcis2018/19/ [accessed on 18 June 2025].
Krath, J., Schürmann, L. and von Korflesch, H.F. (2021). Revealing the theoretical basis of gamification:
A systematic review and analysis of theory in research on gamification, serious games and game-based learning. Computers in Human Behavior, 125: 106963. DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2021.106963.
Lampropoulos, G. and Kinshuk (2024). Virtual reality and gamification in education: A systematic
review. Educational Technology Research and Development, 72: 1691–1785.
Leiss, L., Großschedl, J., Wilde, M., Fränkel, S., Becker-Genschow, S. and Großmann, N. (2025).
Gamification in education—teachers’ perspectives through the lens of the theory of planned behavior. Frontiers in Psychology, 16: 1571463. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1571463.
Lieder, F., Chen, P.Z., Prentice, M., Amo, V. and Tošić, M. (2024). Gamification of Behavior Change:
Mathematical Principle and Proof-of-Concept Study. JMIR Serious Games, 12: e43078. DOI:
https://doi.org/10.2196/43078.
Linde, N., Balian, A., Shabatura, T., Gryshova, I., Petrenko, O. and Shevchenko, A. (2024). Agricultural
technologies as a tool for integrating artificial intelligence into the agricultural infrastructure of Ukraine. Grassroots Journal of Natural Resources, 7(3): 30–51. DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33002/nr2581.6853.0703ukr02.
Martyniuk, A., Hubina, A., Kyseliuk, N., Alyieva, A., Litkovych, Y. and Tryndiuk, V. (2024). Educational
Approaches to Cultivating Environmental Consciousness among Higher Education Students in Ukraine. Grassroots Journal of Natural Resources, 7(3): s115-s130. DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33002/nr2581.6853.0703ukr06.
Miao, H., Saleh, M.S.M. and Zolkepli, I.A. (2022). Gamification as a learning tool for pro-environmental
behavior: A systematic review. Malaysian Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 7(12): e001881.
Ostapenko, I., Zadykhaylo, D., Lyseiuk, A., Tunitska, Y. and Sierova, L. (2024). Global practices and
experiences in developing a green economy amid financial crises. Grassroots Journal of Natural Resources, 7(3): 244–270. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33002/nr2581.6853.070314.
Potryvaieva, N. (2025). The impact of economic and technological factors on the global environment:
Guest editorial. Grassroots Journal of Natural Resources, 8(1): e1–e12. DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33002/nr2581.6853.080100.
Ratinho, E. and Martins, C. (2023). The role of gamified learning strategies in students motivation in high
school and higher education: A systematic review, Heliyon, 9(8): e19159. DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e19159.
Ro, M., Brauer, M., Kuntz, K., Shukla, R. and Bensch, I. (2017). Making cool choices for sustainability:
Testing the effectiveness of a game-based approach to promoting pro-environmental behaviours. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 53: 20–30. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2017.06.007.
Rohenkohl do Canto, N., Grunert, K.G. and Dutra de Barcellos, M. (2023). Goal-framing theory in
environmental behaviours: review, future research agenda and possible applications in behavioural change. Journal of Social Marketing. 13(1): 20–40. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JSOCM-03-2021-0058.
Sailer, M., Hense, J.U., Mayr, S.K. and Mandl, H. (2017). How gamification motivates: An experimental
study of the effects of specific game design elements on psychological need satisfaction. Computers in Human Behavior, 69: 371–380. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.12.033.
Shahzad, M.F., Xu, S., Rehman, O.U. and Javed, I. (2023). Impact of gamification on green consumption
behavior integrating technological awareness, motivation, enjoyment and virtual CSR. Scientific Reports, 13: 21751. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-48291-3.
Silverman, G. (2012). Law games: The importance of virtual worlds and serious video games for the
future of legal education Cambridge University Press eBooks, 130–157. DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511997945.010.
Smartico (2025). Gamification and behavioral economics: Influencing decision-making through games.
Available online at: https://www.smartico.ai/blog-post/gamification-behavioral-economics [accessed on 28 June 2025].
Smiderle, R., Rigo, S.J. and Marques, L.B (2020). The impact of gamification on students’ learning,
engagement and behavior based on their personality traits. Smart Learning Environments, 7: 3. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-019-0098-x.
Starks, K. (2014). Cognitive behavioural game design: A unified model for designing serious games.
Frontiers in Psychology, 5: 28. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00028.
Strada, F., Lopez, M.X., Fabricatore, C., dos Santos, A.D., Gyaurov, D., Battegazzorre, E. and Bottino, A.
(2023). Leveraging a collaborative augmented reality serious game to promote sustainability awareness, commitment and adaptive problem-management. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 172: 103096. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2022.103096.
Ulrich, M. (1997). Games/simulations about environmental issues: existing tools and underlying
concepts. In: Proceedings of the 28th Annual International Conference of the International Simulation and Gaming Association. Tilburg, The Netherlands, 1997. Tilburg: ISAGA, 301–311.
Xu. Y. (2022). The enhanced effect of VR on awareness of environmental protection. In: Proceedings of
the 2021 International Conference on Social Development and Media Communication (SDMC 2021): 391–404.
Suresh, R., Sujatha, S.J. and Gopikuttan, N. (2025). Gamifying Environmental Law: Strategizing Engagement and Compliance through Innovative Strategies. Grassroots Journal of Natural Resources, 8(2): 342-357. Doi: https://doi.org/10.33002/nr2581.6853.080217
Suresh, R., Sujatha, S.J., & Gopikuttan, N. (2025). Gamifying Environmental Law: Strategizing Engagement and Compliance through Innovative Strategies. Grassroots Journal of Natural Resources, 8(2), 342-357. https://doi.org/10.33002/nr2581.6853.080217
Suresh R., Sujatha S.J., Gopikuttan, N. Gamifying Environmental Law: Strategizing Engagement and Compliance through Innovative Strategies. Grassroots Journal of Natural Resources, 2025, 8 (2), 342-357. https://doi.org/10.33002/nr2581.6853.080217
Suresh, Reshma, Sujatha, Saiji Jayakumar, Gopikuttan, Nikhil. 2025. “Gamifying Environmental Law: Strategizing Engagement and Compliance through Innovative Strategies”. Grassroots Journal of Natural Resources, 8 no. 2: 342-357. https://doi.org/10.33002/nr2581.6853.080217
Suresh, Reshma, Saiji Jayakumar Sujatha and Nikhil Gopikuttan. 2025. “Gamifying Environmental Law: Strategizing Engagement and Compliance through Innovative Strategies”. Grassroots Journal of Natural Resources, 8 (2): 342-357. https://doi.org/10.33002/nr2581.6853.080217
| Internet Archive: | https://archive.org/details/m-00566_202602 |
| WorldCat: | https://search.worldcat.org/title/10963848103 |
© 2025 by the author(s). Licensee Grassroots Journal of Natural Resources. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). We allow to freely share (copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format) and adapt (remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially) with a legal code: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode.
Grassroots Journal of Natural Resources by The Grassroots Institute is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Based on a work at www.grassrootsjournals.org.
Go to Top
