Published By:
(ISSN:2581-6853; CODEN: GJNRA9; DOI: 10.33002/nr2581.6853) is an international, scientific double blind peer-reviewed open access journal published 3 times a year online by The Grassroots Institute.
Impact Factor: exaly
Open Access—free for readers, with article processing charges (APC) paid by authors or their institutions.
High Visibility: Indexed in Web of Science (Zoological Record, Biosis Previews, Biological Abstracts, Biosis Full Coverage Unique, and CAB Abstracts), EBSCO and other databases.
Time for Processing: Provisional acceptance of the submitted article is given in 1 week time. After consent of author(s), manuscript is peer-reviewed and a first decision provided to authors in 2-4 weeks after submission.
Recognition of Reviewers: The reviewers who provide timely, thorough peer-review reports receive vouchers entitling them to a discount on the APC of their next publication in the journal, in appreciation of the work done. Reviewers also receive Certificate for their voluntary service.
Coordinated and published by The Grassroots Institute, the Grassroots Journal of Natural Resources (GJNR) is an international journal dedicated to the latest advancements in natural resources throughout the world. The goal of this journal is to provide a platform for scientists, social scientists, policy analysts, managers and practitioners (on all academic and professional levels) all over the world to promote, discuss and share various new issues and developments in different arenas of natural resources.
Zsuzsanna Kara*1, Márta Konczos Szombathelyi2, Gergely Tamás Kucsera3
1Doctoral School of Regional and Economic Sciences, Széchenyi István University, Győr, Hungary.
Email: karazsuzsanna1974@gmail.com ǀ ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4155-1397
2Faculty of Economics, Széchenyi István University, Győr, Hungary. Email: kszm@sze.hu
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5248-7752
3Faculty of Arts & Design, Széchenyi István University, Győr, Hungary. Email: kucseratamas@hotmail.com
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9083-3433
*Corresponding author
Grassroots Journal of Natural Resources, 8(2): 276-305. Doi: https://doi.org/10.33002/nr2581.6853.080214
Received: 28 May 2025
Reviewed: 25 July 2025
Provisionally Accepted: 30 July 2025
Revised: 10 August 2025
Finally Accepted: 12 August 2025
Published: 23 August 2025
This study explores the intersection of culture-based urban development and sustainability through the lens of urban ecology, drawing on the European Capital of Culture (ECoC) programs in Veszprém-Balaton 2023 and Pécs 2010. It addresses the previously limited integration of ecological considerations in culture-based urban policies, highlighting how recent ECoC initiatives, such as Veszprém-Balaton 2023, have increasingly embraced ecological perspectives. The study further investigates how ecological principles can be embedded in cultural strategies to strengthen regional identity and promote long-term urban resilience. Using an interdisciplinary framework, the research integrates literature review, qualitative data analysis, and comparative case study methods. Data sources include ECoC Bidbooks, municipal strategic documents, programme evaluations, and peer-reviewed literature. Key focus areas include brownfield regeneration, low-emission transport, and community-based cultural practices, with emphasis on the ecological roles culture can play in transforming urban environments. The findings show that ECoC programmes can serve as catalysts for both cultural renewal and sustainable urban development. In the case of Veszprém-Balaton 2023, former industrial zones were creatively reused for cultural purposes, supported by initiatives promoting green mobility and circular resource use. Infrastructure projects, such as cultural spaces developed with sustainability criteria, and measures like reusable cup systems and eco-conscious transport solutions contributed to reduced environmental footprints and enhanced public participation. This study addressed ecological dimensions of culture-based urban development by contrasting awarded (Pécs, Veszprém) and non-awarded (Győr) cities. By synthesising lessons from ECoC programmes, it introduces a model for integrating cultural programming with ecological planning, offering scalable approaches for sustainable cultural investment. Future work may investigate Győr’s evolving cultural strategy through an ecological lens, assess long-term outcomes of ECoC projects, and examine cross-regional interconnections in cultural-ecological networks.
Urban ecology; Culture-based development; European capital of culture; Sustainability; Regional identity
Batty, M., Axhausen, K.W., Giannotti, F., Pozdnoukhov, A., Bazzani, A., Wachowicz, M. and Portugali, Y.
(2012). Smart cities of the future. The European Physical Journal Special Topics, 214(1): 481–518. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1140/epjst/e2012-01703-3.
Beatley, T. (2000). Green urbanism: Learning from European cities. Washington DC, USA: Island Press.
Berkecz, B. (2011). Városfejlesztési kérdések és lehetőségek a kulturális főváros után. In Elemző
értékelés a Pécs2010 Európa Kulturális Fővárosa program tapasztalatairól (pp. 37–39). Pécs Város Önkormányzata [Urban development issues and opportunities after the cultural capital. In: Analytical evaluation of the experiences of the Pécs2010 European Capital of Culture program (pp. 37–39)]. Pécs City Municipality, Hungary.
Bozsoki, P. and Szabó, M. (2024). A városi barnamezős területek lehetőségei az élhetőbb városok
szolgálatában. In: J. Sáringer (Ed.), Gazdaság, politika és nyelv: Elemzések és összefüggések (pp. 7–20). [The potential of urban brownfield areas in the service of more liveable cities. In Economy, politics and language: Analyses and interrelations] (pp. 7–20). Available online at:
https://tinyurl.com/m2a757vf [accessed on 22 May 2025].
Carayannis, E.G. and Campbell, D.F. (2010). Triple Helix, Quadruple Helix and Quintuple Helix and
how do knowledge, innovation and the environment relate to each other? A proposed framework for a trans-disciplinary analysis of sustainable development and social ecology. International Journal of Social Ecology and Sustainable Development (IJSESD), 1(1): 41-69. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4018/jsesd.2010010105.
Chan, K.M.A., Satterfield, T. and Goldstein, J. (2012). Rethinking ecosystem services to better address
and navigate cultural values. Ecological Economics, 74: 8–18. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.11.011.
Ciuculescu, E.L. and Luca, F.A. (2024). How can cities build their brand through arts and culture? An
analysis of ECoC bidbooks from 2020 to 2026. Sustainability, 16(8): 3377. DOI:
https://doi.org/10.3390/su16083377.
Clark, G. and Dickson, M. (2003). Cultural strategy and urban regeneration: The role of the cultural
sector in the revitalisation of urban areas. Germany: OECD Publications.
Covenant of Mayors (2020). Sustainable Energy and Climate Action Plan (SECAP) Guidelines.
European Commission. Available at: https://www.covenantofmayors.eu/ [accessed on 22 May 2025].
Elkington, J. (1997). Cannibals with forks: The triple bottom line of 21st-century business. Capstone
Course.
Evans, G. (2005). Measure for measure: Evaluating the evidence of culture's contribution to regeneration.
Urban Studies, 42(5-6): 959–983. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00420980500107102.
Fekete, D. and Morvay, S. (2020). A kreatív városok kulturális-turisztikai-pénzügyi potenciáljának
kvantitatív összehasonlító elemzése (Debrecen, Győr és Veszprém példáján). Területi Statisztika, 60(5): 548–566. [Quantitative comparative analysis of the cultural-tourism-financial potential of creative cities (the case of Debrecen, Győr and Veszprém) Regional Statistics, 60(5): 548–566]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15196/TS600502.
Fekete, D. and Morvay, S. (2023). Kultúraalapú városfejlesztés [Culture-based urban development].
Budapest: MCC Press.
Florida, R. (2002). The rise of the creative class. Basic Books.
Formádi, K., Kővári, E. and Banász, Z. (2024). Úton a fenntarthatóság felé? Négy Európa Kulturális
Főváros ifjúságának környezeti attitűdje [Towards sustainability? The environmental attitudes of youth in four European Capitals of Culture]. Turisztikai és Vidékfejlesztési Tanulmányok (Tourism and Rural Development Studies), 9(1). DOI: https://doi.org/10.15170/TVT.2024.09.01.03.
Garcia, B. (2004). Cultural policy and urban regeneration in Western European cities: Lessons from
experience, prospects for the future. Local Economy, 19(4): 312–326. DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1080/0269094042000286828.
García, B. and Cox, T. (2013). European Capitals of Culture: Success strategies and long-term effects.
European Parliament's Committee on Culture and Education. Available online at:
https://tinyurl.com/yuz97u97 [accessed on 22 May 2025].
Granovetter, M. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78(6): 1360–1380.
Grimm, N.B., Faeth, S.H., Golubiewski, N.E., Redman, C.L., Wu, J., Bai, X. and Briggs, J.M. (2008).
Global change and the ecology of cities. Science, 319(5864): 756–760. DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1150195.
Győr MJV (2021). Helyi Klímastratégia [Local Climate Strategy]. Available online at:
https://gyor.hu/gyor/innovacio/kornyezetvedelem/klimastrategia/ [accessed on 22 May 2025].
Győr MJV (2022). Fenntartható Városfejlesztési Stratégia [Sustainable Urban Development Strategy].
Available online at: https://tinyurl.com/3fz5dt6v [accessed on 08 August 2025].
Harvey, D. (1989). From Managerialism to Entrepreneurialism: The Transformation in Urban
Governance in Late Capitalism. Geografiska Annaler. Series B, Human Geography. Vol. 71, No. 1, The Roots of Geographical Change: 1973 to the Present (1989), pp. 3-17. DOI:
https://doi.org/10.2307/490503.
Hawkes, J. (2001). The fourth pillar of sustainability: Culture’s essential role in public planning.
Champaign, USA: Common Ground Publishing.
Horváth, A. (2011). Az épített környezet fejlesztése. In: Elemző értékelés a Pécs2010 Európa Kulturális
Fővárosa program tapasztalatairól (The development of the built environment. In Analytical evaluation of the experiences of the Pécs2010 European Capital of Culture program), pp. 24–29. Pécs City Municipality, Hungary.
Jakobi, Á., Szabó, M., Miszlivetz, F. and Morvay, S. (2024). A területi stratégiai gondolkodás egy
lehetséges komplex közelítése: a "Kreatív Város Fenntartható Vidék" koncepció friss tapasztalatai [A possible complex approach to territorial strategic thinking: Recent experiences of the "Creative City – Sustainable Region" concept]. Comitatus: Önkormányzati Szemle [Comitatus: Municipal Review], 34(250): 137–145. DOI: https://doi.org/10.59809/Comitatus.2024.34-250.137.
Keserű, B.A. (2024). A fenntartható fejlődés hatása a szellemitulajdon-védelem rendszerére. Akadémiai
Kiadó – Ludovika Egyetemi Kiadó [The impact of sustainable development on the intellectual property protection system]. Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó – Ludovika University Press. DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1556/9789634549635.
Koltai, Z. (2011). Európa Kulturális Fővárosa – Pécs, 2010 program megítélése Pécsett és Budapesten
[European Capital of Culture – The perception of the Pécs 2010 programme in Pécs and Budapest]. Tudásmenedzsment [Knowledge Management], 12(2). Available online at:
https://tinyurl.com/42t7827s [accessed on 22 May 2025].
Kovács, K. (2013). Stratégia és valóság: A Pólus program és a Pécs2010 EKF [Strategy and reality: The
Pólus programme and Pécs2010 ECoC]. In: J. Pálné Kovács (Ed.), Pécs a többszintű kormányzás csapdájában [Pécs in the Trap of Multi-Level Governance] (pp. 59–76). Pécs: Dialog Campus Publishing.
Kővári, E., Pásztor, J. and Raffay-Danyi, Á. (2021). A Pannon Egyetem közösségének
kultúrafogyasztása, az érzelmi és kulturális intelligencia összefüggése [The cultural consumption of the Pannon University community and the correlation between emotional and cultural intelligence]. Veszprém 2023 European Capital of Culture. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14267/VEZTUD.2021.04.05.
Lähdesmäki, T. (2011). Contested identity politics: Analysis of the EU policy objectives and the local
reception of the European Capital of Culture program. Baltic Journal of European Studies. Available online at: https://tinyurl.com/8th9xd8b [accessed on 22 May 2025].
Landry, C. (2000). The creative city: A toolkit for urban innovators. London: Earthscan.
Lees, L. (2008). Gentrification and social mixing: Towards an inclusive urban renaissance? Urban
Studies, 45(12): 2449–2470. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098008097099.
Li, J., Mirzayeva, A., Pak, E., Akhundova, A. and Panjieva, N. (2025). Sustainable Tourism and Cultural
Landscapes: Balancing Development and Preservation. Grassroots Journal of Natural Resources, 8(1): 407–430. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33002/nr2581.6853.080116.
Lipovits, S. (2010). Győr kulturális élete [The cultural life of Győr]. Jegyző és Közigazgatás [Notary and
Public Administration], 12(2). Available online at: https://jegyzo.hu/gyor-kulturalis-elete-20102/ [accessed on 22 May 2025].
Lőrincz, K. and Raffay, Á. (2019). Beyond, azaz túllépni saját magunkon – a turizmus szerepe a
Veszprém2023 Európai Kulturális Főváros projektben [Beyond – exceeding ourselves: the role of tourism in the Veszprém2023 European Capital of Culture project]. Studies in Tourism and Rural Development, 4(2): 18–38. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15170/TVT.2019.04.02.02.
Lőrincz, K., Raffay-Danyi, Á. and Cerquetti, M. (2021). Többdimenziós kulturális értékteremtés a
Veszprém-Balaton2023 Európa Kulturális Fővárosa projekt tükrében [Multidimensional cultural value creation considering the Veszprém-Balaton2023 European Capital of Culture project]. Marketing & Management, 55(2): 17–26. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15170/MM.2021.55.02.02.
Makai, A.L. and Rámháp, S. (2020). Tőkealapok és vállalkozó egyetemek a lokális innovációs térben
[Venture capital funds and entrepreneurial universities in the local innovation space]. Polgári Szemle [Civic Review], 16(4–6): 379–392. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24307/psz.2020.1030.
Mavrin, I. (2024). European Capital of Culture and sustainable tourism: Challenges, trends and perspectives.
Tourism, 72(1): 20–34. DOI: https://doi.org/10.37741/t.72.1.2.
Meadows, D.H., Meadows, D.L., Randers, J. and Behrens, W.W. (1972). The limits to growth: A report
for the Club of Rome's project on the predicament of mankind. Universe Books.
Miszlivetz, F. and Márkus, E. (2013). A Kraft-index – kreatív városok – fenntartható vidék.
Vezetéstudomány. Budapest [The KRAFT Index – Creative Cities – Sustainable Regions. Budapest]. Management Review, 44(9): 2–21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14267/VEZTUD.2013.09.01.
M-NU (Moholy-Nagy University of Art and Design) (2023). MOME x BALATORIUM: The VEB2023
ECOC ecological cultural programme made its debut. Available online at:
https://tinyurl.com/mrbxt6kt [accessed on 22 May 2025].
Morvay, S. (2019). Európa Kulturális Fővárosa projekt – a veszprémi, győri és debreceni pályázatok
összehasonlító elemzése [European Capital of Culture project – A comparative analysis of the bids of Veszprém, Győr and Debrecen. Polgári Szemle [Civic Review], 15(4–6): 321–339. DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24307/psz.2019.1221.
Müller, P. (2011). A Pécs 2010 Európa Kulturális Fővárosa projekt kulturális tapasztalatairól és
Navracsics, T. (2023). Egy régió álma vagy egy álom régiója? [A region's dream or a dream of a region?]
Available online at: https://veszprembalaton2023.hu/blob/navracsics-tibor-egy-regio.pdf [accessed on 22 May 2025].
Nesprava, M., Otych, D., Hreshchuk, H., Pyvovarchyk, I., Sarancha, I. and Fedoryshyn, H. (2025).
Greening the Economy and Its Neuropsychological Impacts on Social Quality of Life. Grassroots Journal of Natural Resources, 8(1): 989–1004. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33002/nr2581.6853.080142.
NTAK (2023). Nemzeti Turisztikai Adatszolgáltató Központ [National Tourism Data Supply Centre].
Available online at: https://ntak.hu/bejelentkezes (accessed on 27 March 2025).
Pálné Kovács, I. (2013). Pécs, as the victim of multilevel governance: The case of the project 'European
Capital of Culture' in 2010. Urban Research and Practice, 6(3): 365–375. DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1080/17535069.2013.827907.
Pálné Kovács, I. (2014). Kulturális fővárosok Európában, kormányzási kihívások. In: Tuka, Á. and Glied,
V. (eds.), Pécs a többszintű kormányzás csapdájában: Európa Kulturális Fővárosa – Pécs2010 [European Capitals of Culture and Governance Challenges. In: Tuka, Á. and Glied, V. (eds.), Pécs in the Trap of Multilevel Governance: European Capital of Culture – Pécs2010]. Pécs: IDResearch Ltd./Publikon Publishing, pp. 11–24. Available online at: https://tinyurl.com/n52yzrtp [accessed on 22 May 2025].
Pécs, MJV (n.d.). Fenntartható Energia- és Klíma Akcióterv (SECAP) [Sustainable Energy and Climate
Action Plan (SECAP)] Available online at: https://tinyurl.com/yckyajfb [accessed on 22 May 2025].
Pickett, S.T.A., Cadenasso, M.L. and McGrath, B. (2011). Resilience in ecology and urban design:
Linking theory and practice for sustainable cities. Springer.
Pickett, S.T.A., Cadenasso, M.L., Grove, J.M., Boone, G.C., Groffman, P.M., Irwin, E. and Warren, P.
(2011). Urban ecological systems: Scientific foundations and a decade of progress. Journal of Environmental Management, 92(3): 331–362. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.
Pilkhoffer, M. (2011). A pécsi Európa Kulturális Főváros története: Célok és megvalósulás [The history
of the European Capital of Culture in Pécs: Objectives and implementation]. Available online at:
https://tinyurl.com/3e65f595 [accessed on 22 May 2025].
Póla, P., Pálné Kovács, I. and Gibárti, S. (2023). Pécs, egy periféria fővárosa [Pécs, a capital of the
periphery]. Tér és Társadalom [Space and Society], 37(3): 148–175. DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17649/TET.37.3.3493.
Potryvaieva, N. (2025). The impact of economic and technological factors on the global environment:
Guest editorial. Grassroots Journal of Natural Resources, 8(1): e1–e12.
https://doi.org/10.33002/nr2581.6853.080100.
Potryvaieva, T., Honcharenko, T., Zubko, M., Prykhodko, S. and Liakh, O. (2024) Integrating the
Circular Economy into Business Processes to Increase Environmental Responsibility. Grassroots Journal of Natural Resources, 8(1): 841–858. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33002/nr2581.6853.080132.
Rákosi, S., Petzné Tóth, S., Reider, J., Takács, M.I., Vehrer, A. and Pongrácz, A. (2021). Környezeti
nevelés és fenntarthatóság a Széchenyi István Egyetem képzéseiben. In G. Kozma and E. Szőke-Milinte (Eds.), Energiatudatossági és környezeti nevelés - programok. [Environmental education and sustainability in the training programmes of Széchenyi István University. In Kozma, G. and Szőke-Milinte, E. (Eds.), Energy awareness and environmental education – programmes]. Budapest: Pázmány Péter Katolikus Egyetem, pp. 101–114. Available online at:
https://tinyurl.com/2r8jac8e [accessed on 22 May 2025].
Richards, G. (2021). Rethinking cultural tourism. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing. DOI:
Somlyódy, N. (2005). Le Dél felé (Európa Kulturális Fővárosa pályázat, második forduló). Építészfórum
[Heading South (European Capital of Culture application, second round) Architects’ Forum]. Available online at: https://tinyurl.com/mry7uszm [accessed on 22 May 2025].
Szabó, M. (2024). Kraft Veszprém: nagymintás kérdőíves felmérés tanulságai a kreatív városrégióvá
válás útjáról. Ragyogj tovább, Veszprém – Balaton! Nemzetközi zárókonferencia, 2024. október 7., Veszprém. [Kraft Veszprém: Lessons from a Large-Sample Survey on the Path to Becoming a Creative City-Region. Presentation at the “Shine On, Veszprém–Balaton!” – International Closing Conference, 7 October 2024, Veszprém] Available online at: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3AHHKmvzUjc [accessed 12 May 2025].
Szabó, M., Galambos, K., Karvalics, Z.L., Jensen, J.P. and Miszlivetz, F. (2021). Social innovation –
Theory and practice from the perspective of 'Creative City – Sustainable Region' (KRAFT) national programme. European Integration Studies, 17(2): 37–50. DOI:
https://doi.org/10.46941/2021.e2.37-50.
Szijártó, Z. (2011). Koncepció és kontextus: Az EKF-projekt és Pécs. In Elemző értékelés a Pécs2010
Európa Kulturális Fővárosa program tapasztalatairól (pp. 155–166). [Concept and context: The ECoC project and Pécs. In Analytical evaluation of the experiences of the Pécs2010 European Capital of Culture program (pp. 155–166)]. Pécs City Municipality, Hungary.
Tarrósy, I., and Komlósi, L.I. (2014). A pécsi EKF a magyar politikai diszkurzív térben: Kísérlet új
narratívára és az együttműködés kultúrájának meghonosítására? In: Tuka, Á. and Glied, V. (Eds.) Pécs a többszintű kormányzás csapdájában: Európa Kulturális Fővárosa – Pécs2010. Pécs, Magyarország: IDResearch Kft., Publikon Kiadó. pp. 120-142. [The Pécs ECoC - Cultural Capital of Europe - in the Hungarian political discursive space: An attempt at a new narrative and the establishment of a culture of cooperation? In: Tuka, Á. and Glied, V. (Eds.) Pécs in the trap of multilevel governance: Cultural Capital of Europe – Pécs2010.]
Throsby, D. (2001). Economics and culture. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI:
Tóthné Kardos, K., Karácsony, P. and Duschanek-Konta, K. (2019). Győr mint kulturális és kreatív város
értékelése az Európa Kulturális Főváros 2023 pályázat kapcsán [Assessment of Győr as a cultural and creative city in the context of the European Capital of Culture 2023 bid]. Polgári Szemle, 15(1–3): 220–237. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24307/psz.2019.0914.
Vasvári, B., Mayer, G. and Vasa, L. (2020). A tudományos és innovációs parkok szerepe a tudásgazdaság
és az innovációs ökoszisztéma fejlesztésében [The role of science and innovation parks in developing the knowledge economy and innovation ecosystem]. Space–Economy–Human, 8(2): 95–109.
VEB2023 Bidbook (2023). Veszprém–Balaton 2023 European Capital of Culture (2021). Official
Bidbook. VEB2023 Management Office, Veszprém.
Veszprém MJV (n.d.). Fenntartható Energia- és Klíma Akcióterv (SECAP) [Sustainable Energy and
Climate Action Plan (SECAP)]. Available online at: https://tinyurl.com/yps63uy5 [accessed on 22 May 2025].
Závecz Research (2024). Veszprém-KRAFT 2024 – Lakossági közvéleménykutatás és interjús vizsgálat
[Veszprém-KRAFT 2024 – Public opinion survey and interview-based research]. Available online at: https://tinyurl.com/4838djh6 [accessed on 22 May 2025].
Kara, Z., Szombathelyi, M.K. and Kucsera, G.T. (2025). Culture-Based Urban Development and Sustainability: Experiences from Hungary’s European Capitals of Culture and Implications for Győr. Grassroots Journal of Natural Resources, 8(2): 276-305. Doi: https://doi.org/10.33002/nr2581.6853.080214
Kara, Z., Szombathelyi, M. K., & Kucsera, G. T. (2025). Culture-Based Urban Development and Sustainability: Experiences from Hungary’s European Capitals of Culture and Implications for Győr. Grassroots Journal of Natural Resources, 8(2), 276-305. https://doi.org/10.33002/nr2581.6853.080214
Kara Z., Szombathelyi M. K., Kucsera G. T. Culture-Based Urban Development and Sustainability: Experiences from Hungary’s European Capitals of Culture and Implications for Győr. Grassroots Journal of Natural Resources, 2025, 8 (2), 276-305. https://doi.org/10.33002/nr2581.6853.080214
Kara, Zsuzsanna, Szombathelyi, Márta Konczos, Kucsera, Gergely Tamás. 2025. “Culture-Based Urban Development and Sustainability: Experiences from Hungary’s European Capitals of Culture and Implications for Győr”. Grassroots Journal of Natural Resources, 8 no. 2: 276-305. https://doi.org/10.33002/nr2581.6853.080214
Kara, Zsuzsanna, Márta Konczos Szombathelyi and Gergely Tamás Kucsera. 2025. “Culture-Based Urban Development and Sustainability: Experiences from Hungary’s European Capitals of Culture and Implications for Győr”. Grassroots Journal of Natural Resources, 8 (2): 276-305. https://doi.org/10.33002/nr2581.6853.080214
| Internet Archive: | https://archive.org/details/m-00563_202602 |
| WorldCat: | https://search.worldcat.org/title/10963847565 |
© 2025 by the author(s). Licensee Grassroots Journal of Natural Resources. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). We allow to freely share (copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format) and adapt (remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially) with a legal code: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode.
Grassroots Journal of Natural Resources by The Grassroots Institute is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Based on a work at www.grassrootsjournals.org.
Go to Top
