Published By:
(ISSN:2581-6853; CODEN: GJNRA9; DOI: 10.33002/nr2581.6853) is an international, scientific double blind peer-reviewed open access journal published 3 times a year online by The Grassroots Institute.
Impact Factor: exaly
Open Access—free for readers, with article processing charges (APC) paid by authors or their institutions.
High Visibility: Indexed in the SCOPUS, Web of Science (Zoological Record, Biosis Previews, Biological Abstracts, Biosis Full Coverage Unique, and CAB Abstracts), EBSCO and other databases.
Fast Publication: Provisional acceptance of the submitted article is given in 1 week time. After consent of author(s), manuscript is peer-reviewed and a first decision provided to authors in 2-4 weeks after submission.
Recognition of Reviewers: The reviewers who provide timely, thorough peer-review reports receive vouchers entitling them to a discount on the APC of their next publication in the journal, in appreciation of the work done. Reviewers also receive Certificate for their voluntary service.
Coordinated and published by The Grassroots Institute, the Grassroots Journal of Natural Resources (GJNR) is an international journal dedicated to the latest advancements in natural resources throughout the world. The goal of this journal is to provide a platform for scientists, social scientists, policy analysts, managers and practitioners (on all academic and professional levels) all over the world to promote, discuss and share various new issues and developments in different arenas of natural resources.
Kannattuvadakkethil Krishnankutty Ambily*1, Arumugham Ulaganathan2
1Agronomy/Soils Division, Rubber Research Institute of India, Rubber Board P.O., Kottayam, Kerala, India.
Email: ambili@rubberboard.org.in | ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8814-6463
2Agronomy/Soils Division, Rubber Research Institute of India, Rubber Bard P.O., Kottayam, Kerala, India.
Email: ulaganathan.aru@gmail.com | ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0002-5165-5747
*Corresponding author
Grassroots Journal of Natural Resources, 7(2): 288-300. Doi: https://doi.org/10.33002/nr2581.6853.070215
Received: 16 March 2023
Reviewed: 26 July 2024
Provisionally Accepted: 29 July 2024
Revised: 01 August 2024
Finally Accepted: 05 August 2024
Published: 10 August 2024
Ecosystem level carbon loss and the resultant loss of CO2 mitigating capacity of rubber (Hevea brasiliensis) plantations of 23 and 30 years in a hilly urbanized terrain dominated by development and construction activities was investigated. The total carbon loss of the rubber ecosystem due to the destruction of a surface area of 10, 25, and 50 hectares of rubber plantation was derived from published data of destructive tree felling based on the biomass and carbon sequestration potential of one hectare of rubber plantation. The popularly cultivated clone RRII 105 since 1980 occupying 85% of the total rubber area in India was chosen for the study. The data was analyzed using ANOVA and Standard Error (SE) Means for the base data and extrapolated to ecosystem-level calculation. Results revealed a total ecosystem carbon loss of 2142, 5355, 10710 tons for 23 years and 3415, 8538, 17075 tons for 30 years under deforested area of 10, 25, and 50 hectares, respectively. The carbon loss (tons) from tree biomass (tons) removal was 570, 1425, 2850, litter fall was 575, 1438, 2875 and sheet rubber was 432, 1080, 2160 for 23 year plantation. In 30 years plantation, carbon loss from tree biomass was 1480, 3700, 740, litter fall was 750, 1875, 3750, and sheet rubber was 621, 1553, 3105 tons. Total soil carbon stock loss (tons) was 565, 1413 and 2825 for both 23 and 30 years, since the soil carbon stock was calculated similarly with one value for both plantation years. Other studied clones such as RRII 414, RRII 429, and RRII 417 recorded 44-50 percent higher carbon loss compared to RRII 105. The highest carbon loss was recorded in the central part and lowest in the area with severe drought. The study clearly depicts the importance of rubber plantations in mitigating climate change due to massive removal of rubber plantations, an important economically and environmentally sustainable agro ecosystem. The study recommends for putting in place appropriate policies and regulations to restrict the removal of economic tree plantations for ecosystem sustainability.
Ecosystem; Carbon loss; Urbanization; Impact; Rubber plantation
Ambily, K.K. and Ulaganathan, A. (2015). Biomass production carbon storage capacity and
nutrient export in natural rubber. Rubber Board Bulletin, 33(4):4-10. Available online at:
https://shorturl.at/Cj6SJ (accessed 23 June 2024).
Ambily, K.K., Meenakumari, T., Jessy, M.D., Ulaganathan, A. and Nair, N.U. (2012). Carbon
sequestration potential of RRII 400 series clones of Hevea brasiliensis. Rubber Science, 25(2): 233-240. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5555/20133068243.
Ambily, K.K., Ulaganathan, A. and Sathisha, G.C. (2022). Impact of removal of rubber
plantation for urbanization on CO2 mitigating capacity by the loss of carbon sink in Kerala state, India. Journal of Plantation Crops, 50(3): 153-161. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5555/20230276569.
Anjali, K., Khuman, Y.S.C. and Sokhi, J. (2020). A review of the interrelations of terrestrial
carbon sequestration and urban forests. Aims Environmental Science, 7(6): 464-485. DOI:
https://doi.org/10.3934/environsci.2020030.
Annamalainathan, K., Satheesh, P.R. and Jacob, J. (2011). Ecosystem flux measurements in
rubber plantations. Rubber Science, 24(1): 28-37. Available online at: https://shorturl.at/pggSj (accessed 23 June 2024).
Buchanam, G.M., Field, R.H., Bradbury, R.B., Luraschi, B. and Vickery, J.A. (2021). The
impact of tree loss on carbon management in West Africa. Carbon Management, 12(6): 623-633.
Jacob, J. (2003a). Carbon sequestration capacity of natural rubber plantations. IRRDB
Symposium on Challenges for Natural Rubber in Globalization, 15-17 September 2003, Chiang Mai, Thailand. Available online at: https://shorturl.at/1kzgv (accessed 23 June 2024).
Jacob, J. (2003b). Eco-friendly credentials of natural rubber. In: C. Kuruvilla Jacob (ed.),
Global Competitiveness of Indian Rubber Plantation Industry: Rubber Planters’ Conference, India 2002. Rubber Research Institute of India, Kottayam, India, pp. 245-251. Available online at:
https://shorturl.at/5kVv5 (accessed 23 June 2024).
Jacob, J. (2005a). Forestry and plantations: Opportunities under Kyoto protocol. Economic and
Political Weekly, 60(20): 2043-2045. Available online at: https://www.jstor.org/stable/4416639 (accessed 23 June 2024).
Jacob, J. (2005b). Kyoto protocol and Indian NR sector: Will the Govt. care to give NR its due?
Rubber Asia, 19(2): 173-176. Available online at:
https://www.jstor.org/stable/24110795 (accessed 23 June 2024).
Jacob, J. (2005c). The science, politics and economics of global climate change: Implications for
the carbon sink projects. Current Science, 89(3): 464-474. Available online at: https://www.jstor.org/stable/24110795 (accessed 23 June 2024).
Jacob, J. (2005d). The science, politics and economics of global climate change: Implications for
the plantation and forestry systems. Prithvi 2005: Global Eco Meet,23-24 February 2005, Swadeshi Science Movement, Trivandrum, India. Available online at: https://shorturl.at/2ycwn (accessed 23 June 2024).
Karthikakuttyamma, M. (1997). Effect of continuous cultivation of rubber (Hevea rasiliensis)on
soilproperties. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Kerala, Trivandrum, India, 176 p.
Karthikakuttyamma, M., Satisha, G.C., Suresh, P.R. and Aiyer, R.S. (2004). Biomass production
and nutrient budgeting of Hevea brasiliensis in South India. RubberScience, 17(2): 108-114. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5555/20053168496.
Kaul, M., Mohren, G.M.J. and Dadhwal, V.K. (2010). Carbon storage and sequestration potential
of selected tree species in India. Mitigation, Adaptation Strategic Global Change, 15: 489-510. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11027-010-9230-5.
Kothandaraman, S., Dar, J.A., Sundarapandian, S., Dayanandan, S. and Khan, M.L. (2020).
Ecosystem-level carbon storage and its links to diversity, structural and environmental drivers in tropical forests of Western Ghats, India. Scientific Reports, 10(13444). DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-70313-6.
Philip, A., Philip, V., George, E.S., Punnoose, K.I. and Mathew, M. (2003). Leaf litter
decomposition and nutrient release in a fifteen year old rubber plantation. Indian Journal of Natural Rubber Research, 16(1&2): 81-84. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5555/20043117978.
Rajagopal, N. and Sebastian, T. (2011). Reduction in carbon dioxide emission in block rubber
production by biomass gasification. Rubber Science, 24(1): 140-144. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5555/20123010421.
Russel, A.E. and Kumar, B.M. (2019). Modelling experiments for evaluating the effects of trees,
increasing temperatures and soil texture on carbon stocks in Agroforestry systems in Kerala, India. Forests, 10(803). DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/f10090803.
Sallustio, L., Quatrini, V., Gene Letti, D., Corona, P. and Marchetti, M. (2015). Assessing land
take by urban development and its impact on carbon storage: Findings from two case studies in Italy. Environment Impact Assessment Review, 54: 80-90. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar. 2015.05.006.
Strohbach, M.W. and Haase, D. (2012). Above-ground carbon storage by urban trees in Leipzig,
Germany: Analysis of patterns in a European city. Landscape and Urban Planning, 104(1): 104. Available online at: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0169204611002891 (accessed 23 June 2024).
Strohbach, M.W., Arnold, E. and Haase, D. (2012). The carbon footprint of urban green space—
a life cycle approach. Landscape and Urban Planning, 104(2): 220-229. Available online at: https://www.academia.edu/download/47694886/The_carbon_footprint_of_urban_green_spac20160801-7647-1j9wyux.pdf (accessed 23 June 2024).
Vijayakumar, K.R., Chandrashekar, T.R. and Philip, V. (2000). Agroclimate. In: George, P.J.
and Jacob, C.K. (eds.), Natural Rubber: Agromanagement and Crop Processing. Rubber Research Institute of India, Kottayam, pp. 97-116. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-97-0092-9_7.
Ambily, K.K. and Ulaganathan, A. (2024). Assessing Ecosystem Level Carbon Loss and Mitigating Capacity of Rubber (Hevea brasiliensis) Plantations in Hilly Regions in India. Grassroots Journal of Natural Resources, 7(2): 288-300. Doi: https://doi.org/10.33002/nr2581.6853.070215
Ambily, K. K., & Ulaganathan, A. (2024). Assessing Ecosystem Level Carbon Loss and Mitigating Capacity of Rubber (Hevea brasiliensis) Plantations in Hilly Regions in India. Grassroots Journal of Natural Resources, 7(2), 288-300. https://doi.org/10.33002/nr2581.6853.070215
Ambily K.K., Ulaganathan A. Assessing Ecosystem Level Carbon Loss and Mitigating Capacity of Rubber (Hevea brasiliensis) Plantations in Hilly Regions in India. Grassroots Journal of Natural Resources, 2024, 7 (2), 288-300. https://doi.org/10.33002/nr2581.6853.070215
Ambily, Kannattuvadakkethil Krishnankutty, Ulaganathan, Arumugham. 2024. “Assessing Ecosystem Level Carbon Loss and Mitigating Capacity of Rubber (Hevea brasiliensis) Plantations in Hilly Regions in India”. Grassroots Journal of Natural Resources, 7 no. 2: 288-300. https://doi.org/10.33002/nr2581.6853.070215
Ambily, Kannattuvadakkethil Krishnankutty and Arumugham Ulaganathan. 2024. “Assessing Ecosystem Level Carbon Loss and Mitigating Capacity of Rubber (Hevea brasiliensis) Plantations in Hilly Regions in India”. Grassroots Journal of Natural Resources, 7 (2): 288-300. https://doi.org/10.33002/nr2581.6853.070215
| Crossref: | https://doi.org/10.33002/nr2581.6853.070215 |
| EuroPub: | |
| Scilit: | |
| Publons: | |
| SSRN: | |
| Cite Factor: | |
| Academia.edu: | |
| Dimensions: | |
| ZENODO: | |
| OpenAIRE: | |
| Scribd: | |
| ScienceGate: | |
| J-Gate: | |
| Research Gate: | |
| Google Scholar: | |
| Harvard Dataverse: | |
| FAO-AGRIS: |
| Internet Archive: | |
| WorldCat: |
© 2024 by the author(s). Licensee Grassroots Journal of Natural Resources. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). We allow to freely share (copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format) and adapt (remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially) with a legal code: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode.
Grassroots Journal of Natural Resources by The Grassroots Institute is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Based on a work at www.grassrootsjournals.org.
Go to Top
