(ISSN:2581-6853; CODEN: GJNRA9; DOI: 10.33002) is an international, scientific double blind peer-reviewed open access journal published quarterly online by The Grassroots Institute.
Open Access—free for readers, with article processing charges (APC) paid by authors or their institutions.
High Visibility: Indexed in the Web of Science and other databases.
Fast Publication: Primary acceptance to the submitted article is given in 1 week time. After consent of author(s), manuscript is peer-reviewed and a first decision provided to authors in 2-4 weeks after submission.
Recognition of Reviewers: The reviewers who provide timely, thorough peer-review reports receive vouchers entitling them to a discount on the APC of their next publication in the journal, in appreciation of the work done. Reviewers also receive Certificate for their voluntary service.
Coordinated and published by the Grassroots Institute, the Grassroots Journal of Natural Resources (GJNR) is an international journal dedicated to the latest advancements in natural resources throughout the world. The goal of this journal is to provide a platform for scientists, social scientists, policy analysts, managers and practitioners (on all academic and professional levels) all over the world to promote, discuss and share various new issues and developments in different arenas of natural resources.
Harish Bahadur Chand*1, Sanjay Singh2, Abhishek Kumar3, Anil Kumar Kewat4, Roshan Bhatt5, Ramesh Bohara6
1Forest Research Institute, Dehradun, India. Email: firstname.lastname@example.org | ORCID: 0000-0002-3098-152X
2Indian Council of Forestry Research and Education, India.
Email: email@example.com | ORCID: 0000-0003-4668-7808
3Forest Research Institute, Dehradun, India. Email: firstname.lastname@example.org| ORCID: 0000-0002-4666-3438
4Forest Research Institute, Dehradun, India. Email: email@example.com | ORCID: 0000-0002-6702-2111
5Institute of Forestry, Tribhuvan University, Nepal. Email: firstname.lastname@example.org | ORCID: 0000-0002-7426-0097
6Sahid Bishnu-Dhani Memorial Polytechnic Institute, Nepal.
Email: email@example.com | ORCID: 0000-0002-0586-2748
Grassroots Journal of Natural Resources, 4(3): 185-200. Doi: https://doi.org/10.33002/nr2581.6853.040314
Received: 13 August 2021
Reviewed: 31 August 2021
Provisionally Accepted: 03 September 2021
Revised: 17 September 2021
Finally Accepted: 20 September 2021
Published: 30 September 2021
Climate change is a worldwide issue with detrimental effects on ecosystems and human well-being. Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation (REDD) is a worldwide policy tool for combating climate change by reducing emissions from the forestry sector and has received widespread attention. Since the program's inception, India has been a strong advocate for REDD+ and its activities. The goal of this research is to evaluate India's current REDD+ readiness. India is the fourth largest CO2 emitter in the world, accounting for 7% of global CO2 emissions. India's emission trajectory shows the country's ever-increasing CO2 emission trend, with an annual average increase rate of 5-6 percent. India has a large geographical area and forest cover, and it holds 7,124.6 million tons of carbon stock. Forests are traditionally managed through a participatory approach, which is similar to REDD+ activities. India has made significant progress toward REDD+ implementation by developing a national REDD+ strategy, enacting consistent laws and regulations, and demonstrating accountability and monitoring of national forest carbon. However, several issues, including forest dependency, community rights, capacity building, policies, and finance, should be carefully addressed to overcome hurdles in REDD+ implementation.
Carbon stock; Participatory approach; Forest dependency; Community rights
Aggarwal, A., Paul, V. and Das, S. (2009). Forest Resources: Degradation, Livelihoods, and Climate
Allen, M.R., Dube, O.P., Solecki, W., Aragón-Durand, F., Cramer, W., Humphreys, S., Kainuma, M., Kala,
Angelsen, A., Brockhaus, M., Sunderlin, W., Verchot, L. and Dokken T. (2012). Analysing REDD:
Angelsen, A. (2008). Moving Ahead with REDD+: Options, Issues, and Implications. Center for
Bhattacharya, P. and Mehra, S. (2021). REDD+ in the Indian Context: Planning and Implementation
Bohara, R., Chand, H.B. and Tewari, A. (2018). Biomass and Carbon Stock in Kharsu Oak (Quercus
Cail, S. and Criqui, P. (2021). Carbon Dioxide Emissions by the Four Largest World Emitters: Past
Caplow, S., Jagger, P., Lawlor, K. and Sills, E. (2011). Evaluating land use and livelihood impacts of
Champion, H.G. and Seth, S.K. (1968). A revised survey of forest types of India. Government of India,
Chand, H.B., Singh, H. and Chhetri, R. (2018). Carbon Sequestration Potential in Sahid Smriti
Chhatre, A., Lakhanpal, S., Larson, A.M., Nelson, F., Ojha, H. and Rao, J. (2012). Social safeguards and
Chitale, V.S., Behera, M.D. and Roy, P.S. (2014). Future of endemic flora of biodiversity hotspots in
FAO (2015). Assessment of forests and carbon stocks, 1990–2015. FAO, Rome, 4 pp. Available
FAO (2020). Global Forest Resources Assessment (key findings). FAO, Rome, 16 pp. DOI:
FCCC (2005). Report of the Conference of the Parties on its eleventh session, held at Montreal from
Federici, S., Lee, D. and Herold, M. (2018). Forest Mitigation: A Permanent Contribution to the Paris
Fletcher, R., Dressler, W., Büscher, B. and Anderson, Z.R. (2016). Questioning REDD+ and the future
FSI (2019). India State of Forest Report. Forest Survey of India, FSI (Ministry of Environment and
Goetz, S.J., Herold, M., De Sy, V., Kissinger, G., Brockhaus, M. and Skutsch, M. (2014). How countries
Hamrick, K. and Gallant, M. (2018). Voluntary carbon markets insights: 2018 outlook and first-
Hiraldo, R. and Tanner, T. (2011). Forest voices: Competing narratives over REDD+. IDS bulletin,
Hosonuma, N., Herold, M., De Sy, V., De Fries, R.S., Brockhaus, M., Verchot, L., Angelsen, A. and
IISD (2015). Earth Negotiations Bulletin No. 663. Published by the International Institute for
IPCC (1996). Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories. An Assessment of the
IPCC (2007). Climate Change 2007: Synthesis report. Summary for policy makers. An Assessment of
IPCC (2014). Climate Change 2014: Synthesis Report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to
IPCC (2018). Mitigation Pathways Compatible with 1.5°C in the Context of Sustainable
IPCC (2019). Climate Change and Land: an IPCC special report on climate change, desertification,
Isseren-Hamakers, I.J., Gupta, A., Herold, M., Peña-Claros, M. and Vijge, M. J. (2012). Will REDD+
Kissinger, G. M., Herold, M. and De Sy, V. (2012). Drivers of deforestation and forest degradation: A
Larson, A.M., Brockhaus, M., Sunderlin, W.D., Duchelle, A., Babon, A., Dokken, T. and Huynh, T.B.
Le Quéré C, Moriarty, R. and Andrew, R.M. (2015). Global Carbon Budget 2014. Earth System
Le Quéré, C., Andrew, R.M., Friedlingstein, P., Sitch, S., Pongratz, J., Manning, A.C., Korsbakken, J.I.,
Luttrell, C., Loft, L., Gebara, M.F., Kweka, D., Brockhaus, M., Angelsen, A. and Sunderlin, W.D. (2013).
Lyster, R. (2011). REDD+, transparency, participation and resource rights: the role of law.
Minang, P.A., Van Noordwijk, M., Duguma, L.A., Alemagi, D., Do, T.H., Bernard F., Agung, P., Robiglio,
MoEF (2009). State of Environment Report. New Delhi: Ministry of Environment and Forest.
MoEFCC (2018). National REDD+ Strategy India, Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate
Moonen, P.C., Verbist, B., Schaepherders, J., Meyi, M.B., Van Rompaey, A., and Muys, B. (2016). Actor-
Mulyani, M. and Jepson, P. (2013). REDD+ and forest governance in Indonesia: A multistakeholder
Neupane, P.R. (2015). Viability assessment of jurisdictional Reduced Emissions from Deforestation
Olander, L.P., Galik, C.S. and Kissinger, G.A. (2012). Operationalizing REDD+: scope of reduced
Olivier, J.G.J. and Peters, J.A.H.W. (2020). Trends in global CO2 and total greenhouse gas emissions:
Pearson, T.R., Brown, S., Murray, L., and Sidman, G. (2017). Greenhouse gas emissions from tropical
Pendrill, F., Persson, U.M., Godar, J., Kastner, T., Moran, D., Schmidt, S. and Wood, R. (2019).
Phelps, J., Guerrero, M.C., Dalabajan, D.A., Young, B. and Webb, E.L. (2010). What makes a 'REDD'
Rawat, R.S., Arora, G., Shilpa, G. and Shaktan, T. (2020). Opportunities and Challenges for
Sahu, S.C., Kumar, M. and Ravindranath, N.H. (2015). Carbon stocks and fluxes for forests in Odisha
Seymour, F. and Busch, J. (2016). Why Forests? Why Now? the Science, Economics, and Politics of
Sikor, T., Stahl, J., Enters, T., Ribot, J.C., Singh, N., Sunderlin, W.D. and Wollenberg, L. (2010). REDD-
Singh, T.P., Rawat, V.R.S. and Rawat, R.S. (2015). Implementing REDD+ as a climate mitigation
Stern, N.H. (2007). The Economics of Climate Change: The Stern Review. Cambridge, UK; New York:
Streck, C. (2016). Mobilizing finance for REDD+ after Paris. Journal for European Environmental
Suganthi, K., Das, K.R., Selvaraj, M., Kurinji, S., Goel, M. and Govindaraju, M. (2017). Assessment of
Tegegne, Y.T., Lindner, M., Fobissie, K., and Kanninen, M. (2016). Evolution of drivers of
Turnhout, E., Gupta, A., Weatherley-Singh, J., Vijge, M.J., de Koning, J., Visseren-Hamakers, I.J.,
UNFCCC (2005). Item 6 of the Provisional Agenda. Reducing Emissions from Deforestation in
UNFCCC (2010). 1/CP. 16 the Cancun Agreement. In: United Nations Framework Convention on
UNFCCC (2011). Report of the Conference of the Parties on its Sixteenth Session, Cancun, 29
UNFCCC (2015). Adoption of the Paris Agreement, Fccc/cp/2015/l.9/rev.1, UNFCCC, Bonn,
UN-REDD (2016). Towards a Common Understanding of REDD+ Under the UNFCCC: A UN-REDD
Vergara-Asenjo, G., Mateo-Vega, J., Alvarado, A. and Potvin, C. (2017). A participatory approach to
Yoshikura, T., Amano, M., Chikaraishi, H., Supriyanto, B. and Wardhana, D. (2016). Evaluation of
Chand, H.B., Singh, S., Kumar, A., Kewat, A.K., Bhatt, R. and Bohara, R. (2021). Comprehensive Overview of REDD+ in India: Status, Opportunities and Challenges. Grassroots Journal of Natural Resources, 4(3): 185-200. Doi: https://doi.org/10.33002/nr2581.6853.040314
Chand, H.B., Singh, S., Kumar, A., Kewat, A.K., Bhatt, R., & Bohara, R. (2021). Comprehensive Overview of REDD+ in India: Status, Opportunities and Challenges. Grassroots Journal of Natural Resources, 4(3), 185-200. https://doi.org/10.33002/nr2581.6853.040314
Chand, Harish Bahadur, Singh, Sanjay, Kumar, Abhishek, Kewat, Anil Kumar, Bhatt, Roshan, Bohara, Ramesh. 2021. “Comprehensive Overview of REDD+ in India: Status, Opportunities and Challenges”. Grassroots Journal of Natural Resources, 4 no. 3: 185-200. https://doi.org/10.33002/nr2581.6853.040314
Chand H.B., Singh S., Kumar A., Kewat A.K., Bhatt R., Bohara, R. Comprehensive Overview of REDD+ in India: Status, Opportunities and Challenges. Grassroots Journal of Natural Resources, 2021, 4 (3), 185-200. https://doi.org/10.33002/nr2581.6853.040314
Chand, Harish Bahadur, Sanjay Singh, Abhishek Kumar, Anil Kumar Kewat, Roshan Bhatt and Ramesh Bohara. 2021. “Comprehensive Overview of REDD+ in India: Status, Opportunities and Challenges”. Grassroots Journal of Natural Resources, 4 (3): 185-200. https://doi.org/10.33002/nr2581.6853.040314
© 2021 by the author(s). Licensee Grassroots Journal of Natural Resources. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). We allow to freely share (copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format) and adapt (remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially) with a legal code: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode.
Grassroots Journal of Natural Resources by The Grassroots Institute is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Based on a work at www.grassrootsjournals.org.
Go to Top