The esteemed authors willing to submit their manuscripts for publishing in the journals published by The Grassroots Institute should express due diligence and take note of the following points:
Grassroots Journal of Natural Resources
Journal of Environmental Law & Policy
What is ‘plagiarism’? The plagiarism includes copying text, ideas, images, or data from another source, even from your own publications, without giving any credit to the original source. It is essential to cite the source if text is reused or copied from another source. The reused text must be between quotes and the original source must be cited. Please note that if plagiarism is detected during the peer review process, the manuscript may be rejected. If plagiarism is detected after publication, we need to publish a correction or retract the paper.
Some authors may also manipulate the images. Any kind of manipulation in the images already published by someone else is not permitted. If irregular image manipulation is identified and confirmed during the peer review process, we may reject the manuscript.
The journals of The Grassroots Institute are committed to maintaining high standards through a rigorous peer-review together with strict ethical policies. Any infringements of professional ethical codes, such as plagiarism, fraudulent use of data, bogus claims of authorship, are taken very seriously.
An Initial Plagiarism Check is carried out for every manuscript submitted to the journals of The Grassroots Institute.
This ethical compliance is important for those whose research is involving medical data collection from human subjects. The authors need to comply with the WMA Declaration of Helsinki. Additionally, various policies are also listed on WMA website and such policies would be useful for the researchers dealing with human bodies. To read more on research ethics, please consider reading What is Ethics in Research? Also, please do not forget reading European Commission on research ethics.
As evidence, the Methods or Methodology section (or text describing the experimental procedures) should include local, national or international ethical approval statements. In case, the research was conducted where no formal ethics committee exists (applicable to only developing countries), the studies shall have complied with the Helsinki Declaration (described above) as revised in 2013.
According to Simon Festing and Robin Wilkinson, “No responsible scientist wants to use animals or cause them unnecessary suffering if it can be avoided, and therefore scientists accept controls on the use of animals in research. More generally, the bioscience community accepts that animals should be used for research only within an ethical framework.” The authors are expected to be aware of legal boundation on the researchers who use or intend to use animals in their experimentation or field studies. Authors are expected to read and follow the observations and guidelines in this context. Because the journals of The Grassroots Institute comply with the ARRIVE we will need uploading the checklist at the time of submission, if the research has involved animals.
ARRIVE (Animal Research: Reporting of In Vivo Experiments) is a set of guidelines to improve the reporting of research using animals. Authors should read the ARRIVE items, crosscheck research work against its CHECKLIST and finally upload them during the submission process of the manuscript.
In addition, we also support 3Rs principals (Replacement, Reduction and Refinement) for humans and animals’ usage in research. Briefly 3Rs are:
Replacement: approaches which avoid or replace the use of animals
Reduction: approaches which minimise the number of animals used per experiment
Refinement: approaches which minimise animal suffering and improve welfare
If plants are involved in your research, authors need to follow Convention on Biological Diversity and the Convention on the Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora.
Authors must provide relevant documents and unique digital identifier for manuscripts that describe new taxa or species. They should also declare that the relevant guidelines have been followed for algae, fungi and plants, zoological taxa, bacteria, and viruses. Registration numbers for the new species (for e.g., from MycoBank for fungi or ZooBank for zoological species) should be stated in the manuscript. New virus names should be sent to the relevant study groups for consideration before publication in a journal.
To understand issues of research involving Indigenous peoples and their traditional knowledge, authors are encouraged to read references in global context, such as:
While documenting and researching Indigenous Traditional Knowledge (ITK), researchers and authors should follow a list of minimum ethical practices as suggested by WIPO.
Australia, Canada and UK have pioneered research ethics compliances if the research involves Indigenous peoples and their traditional knowledge. Examples of Australia and Canada are given below:
FPIC or PIC is a very big subject in discussions and use for many decades. To develop understanding on the PIC from Indigenous Peoples, you may please consider reading FAO Manual on FPIC.Another good link for reading about FPIC in general and in special context of forestry. If that is not possible, you should download, sign (or get signed) and upload the Self Declaration and/or Prior Informed Consent (PIC) from Indigenous Peoples.
Authors and researchers should voluntarily(in developing countries) or necessarily (in developed countries) adopt PIC when involving non-Indigenous local communities as participants of their research. A sample copy of such PIC is available here for use.
(1) Human Rights Statement (in case of research conducted experimentation on humans)
Before submitting a research involving human subjects, authors need to ensure that the work has been conducted in full compliance with the ethical standards of the responsible institutional or national committees on human subjects, as well as with the Helsinki Declaration. In cases, where such committees do not exist, strict compliance with the Helsinki Declaration is essential. In the odd situations, the authors are requested to explain the full rationale for their approach and should clarify all the doubtful matters of the study in the submitted manuscripts. For detailed guidelines on this subject, please read Research Ethics section of this website.
Authors are required to state that written Prior Informed Consent was obtained from the participants/respondents of the study (and the relevant document(s) must be provided when requested by the journal). If verbal informed consent was obtained, it cannot be treated as evidence of the PIC. For case reports/case series involving subjects like minors/children/infants, authors should confirm that the written statements of Prior Informed Consent from legally authorized representatives/parents/guardians are available; if verbal informed consent was obtained, reasons for this must be mentioned.
In order to avoid animal suffering and to raise animal welfare, we strictly request authors to obey all national and international guidelines set out for the care and use of animal in research. ARRIVE (Animal Research Reporting of In Vivo Experiments) has set out guidelines to improve the reporting of research using animals – maximising information published and minimising unnecessary studies. In cases of the research involving experimentation on animals, authors are encouraged to liaise with ARRIVE items, crosscheck research work against their checklist and finally upload them during the submission process of the manuscript.
The authors are required to follow Convention on Biological Diversity and the Convention on the Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora.
Authors must provide relevant documents and unique digital identifier for manuscripts that describe new taxa or species. They should also declare that the relevant guidelines have been followed for algae, fungi and plants, zoological taxa, bacteria, and viruses. Registration numbers for the new species (for e.g., from MycoBank for fungi or ZooBank for zoological species) should be stated in the manuscript. New virus names should be sent to the relevant study groups for consideration before publication in a journal.
Browse ‘Research Ethics’ and read detailed explanations under the heading “Research involving Indigenous peoples and Traditional Knowledge”. Our journals are highly sensitive to the issues of Indigenous peoples and their traditional knowledge.
Prior Informed Consent from Indigenous Peoples
FPIC or PIC is a very big subject in discussions and use for many decades. To develop understanding on the PIC from Indigenous Peoples, you may please consider reading FAO Manual on FPIC. Another good link for reading about FPIC in general and in special context of forestry. If that is not possible, you should download, sign (or get signed) and upload the Self-Declaration and/or Prior Informed Consent (PIC) from Indigenous Peoples.
Authors and researchers should voluntarily (in developing countries) or necessarily (in developed countries) adopt PIC when involving non-Indigenous local communities as participants of their research. A sample copy of such PIC is available here for use.
The individual contributions of authors to the research work and writing of the manuscript should be specified in this declaration; for example, who conceived the study design, who did the data acquisition, who performed the experiments, who did the data analysis, who wrote the manuscript, etc. At the time of submission of manuscript, the online system will ask you to explain this information in accordance with the journal’s rules. In case the online submission is not functional, the Editorial Office will ask you for this declaration at the time of editing process. An example of this declaration is shown below:
Single author case:
Multiple authors case:
Anyone who does not meet the authorship criteria, such as people who provided technical help, institutional/department head who provided general support, or field animators who assisted in the field work, any friend who assisted with the preparation of the manuscript content, should be acknowledged.
All sources of funding for the research work and their role (if at all) in the design of the study and collection, analysis, interpretation of data, and in writing the manuscript should be declared. Provide the name(s) of the funding agency/agencies along with the grant number(s). If the study did not receive any funding, just fill in the entry “Not Applicable”.
At the time of submitting the manuscript, author(s) should declare any personal conflict of interest including any association with consultancies; employment details; participation in advocacy groups; stock or share ownership, and any financial details with regard to grants; fees; honoraria, reimbursements royalties, and any registered patents. Authors should also declare any institutional conflict of interest i.e., if their employer has any financial interest in or is in conflict with the subject matter or materials discussed in the manuscript. If there is no conflict of interest, the author(s) need to add the following statement: “No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.”
Grassroots Journal of Natural Resources
Journal of Environmental Law & Policy
Journal of Policy & Governance
Agrobiodiversity & Agroecology
Our all journals follow COPE standards for publication ethics Authors wishing to publish their papers in our journals must abide to the following standards as set by the COPE. Certain code of practice and standards set by COPE can be downloaded from here.:
It is pertinent for the authors to know the workflow of the articles publishing in our journals. This workflow is more or less same in all journals (i.e., Grassroots Journal of Natural Resources, Journal of Environmental Law & Policy, Journal of Policy & Governance, Agrobiodiversity & Agroecology, etc.).
Grassroots Journal of Natural Resources
Journal of Environmental Law & Policy
Journal of Policy & Governance
Agrobiodiversity & Agroecology
An article having more than one author can change Corresponding Author and can submit the manuscript. Once the submitted manuscript is published. Different aspects of the manuscript preparation and submission as elaborated as under:
Each of our journal has its own:
In this context, potential authors are requested to read webpages of each individual journal published by The Grassroots Institute.
For example, the Author Guidelines of different journals are:
- Grassroots Journal of Natural Resources https://grassrootsjournals.org/gjnr/file/author-guidlines.doc.docx;
- Journal of Environmental Law & Policy https://grassrootsjournals.org/guidlines-for-authors-jelp.php#guidlines;
- Journal of Policy & Governance https://grassrootsjournals.org/jpg-guidlines-for-authors.php#guidlines;
- Agrobiodiversity & Agroecology https://grassrootsjournals.org/aa/file/author-guidlines-aa.docx;
- Pastures & Pastoralism https://grassrootsjournals.org/pp-guidlines-for-authors.php.
Manuscripts submitted to our journals should neither be published previously nor be under consideration for publication in another journal. The main article types that we accept are as follows:
Authors must use the Microsoft Word files to prepare their manuscript. Using the template file will substantially shorten the time to complete copyediting and publication of accepted manuscripts. Supplementary files, such as figures, drawings, tables, photos, etc., should be in MS Word, MS Excel, JPEG or PDF formats. The total amount of data for all files must not exceed 5 MB.
From the respective webpages of the individual journals, please download Manuscript Preparation Template. Using the template file will substantially shorten the time to complete copyediting and publication of accepted manuscripts.
Manuscript templates of different journals are linked in right side menu of each journal:
- Grassroots Journal of Natural Resources https://grassrootsjournals.org/gjnr/gjnr-manuscript-template.docx
- Journal of Environmental Law & Policy https://grassrootsjournals.org/jelp/file/manuscript-template-jelp.docx
- Journal of Policy & Governance https://grassrootsjournals.org/jpg/file/jpg-manuscript-template.docx
- Agrobiodiversity & Agroecology https://grassrootsjournals.org/aa/file/aa-manuscript-template.docx
- Pastures & Pastoralism https://grassrootsjournals.org/pp/file/pp-manuscript-template.docx
To submit your manuscript, visit the Submit Your Manuscript link. Once you have registered and created login and password, you will be asked to Submit Your Manuscript. All steps needed for submitting a manuscript are explained on this link. In online submission gateway, when you choose a particular journal while starting submission process, you will be guided what requirements you will need to fulfil. In case, the online submission gateway is not functional, the submitting author is guided to submit the manuscript by using appropriate email just on the bottom of Submit Your Manuscript page.
A cover letter must be included with each manuscript submission. It should be concise and explain why the content of the paper is significant, placing the findings in the context of existing work and why it fits the scope of the journal. Author needs to confirm in Consent Form that neither the manuscript nor any parts of its content are currently under consideration or published in another journal. The names of proposed and excluded reviewers should be provided in the submission system, not in the cover letter.
Along with the article submitted to any journal of The Grassroots Institute, the Corresponding Author must sign a Consent Form and submit online. This Consent Form contains several crucial declarations by the author(s), including statements regarding no plagiarism, authors’ responsibilities and no simultaneous submission of the manuscript.
Consent Form is mandatory before the manuscript is processed further. This Form can be downloaded from the link Consent Form (see also the Submit Your Manuscript).
Immediately after an article is published online, the Editorial Office informs all the concerned authors to check and verify not only the contents of the published article but also the information placed on the webpages. Within 3 days time, the authors file their corrections wherever they spot and intimate the respective journal, which undertakes those corrections.
Once the issue of the journal is published, if an article has major changes (e.g., in a figure, in conclusions, whole paragraph added, correction of a species name or equation, or addition of missing details about a method, etc.) affecting significantly the scientific interpretation of a paper, an Addendum can be published in the next issue of the journal. In case, crucial results (e.g., missing grant number, additional affiliation, clarification regarding some aspect of methods/analysis, etc.) were unintentionally overlooked or removed from the original text, through an Addendum the original article can be amended with the mentions of the previously omitted results. The Addendum would be published, with the manuscript number of the article.
Why retractions? An article published by a journal by The Grassroots Institute can be retracted only if a scientific misconduct is observed. The scientific misconduct includes data fabrication, data falsification including deceptive manipulation of images, ethical breaches, and plagiarism. Sometimes, the inappropriate methodology compromising integrity of research may also lead to retraction of the published article.
The Grassroots Institute follows the recommendations of the Retraction Guidelines of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) for retraction. Potential retractions are thoroughly investigated by the Editorial Office with the support of the Editorial Board and final approval by the Editor-in-Chief. There may be circumstances in which no misconduct is proven, but an exchange of letters to the Editors could be published to highlight matters of debate to readers.
There may be circumstances in which no misconduct is proven, but an exchange of letters to the Editors could be published to highlight matters of debate to readers.
In the situation of a complaint of reader against an article’s contents, a reader will approach the Editorial Office or the Editor-in-Chief of a journal. In such circumstances, the Editorial Office may invite the reader to write a short and reasoned Comment on that particular article. After consideration and review by the Editors, the Comment may be published. The Editorial Office may approach the author(s) of the article and invite to prepare a Reply. If the reader’s Comments are substantiated by the authors, the Editorial Office may consequently publish a Correction or Reply.
In the era of electronic communications, there are ample opportunities of producing fabricated and fictious data. The journals published by The Grassroots Institute fully endorse and conform the most prevalent ethical guidelines and publication standards. Therefore, ethical issues and scientific misconduct (as described in Retraction section) are obviously handled very seriously by our journals. If something serious anomaly is noticed during the process of review, editing or processing of article, the author is asked for clarifications. In case, the clarifications are unsatisfactory, the article can either be rejected before publication or be retracted if already published. The authors can appeal in writing against the Editor's decision on the manuscript.
The Editorial Office of all our journals also check the manuscripts for plagiarism and any fraudulent data prior to the processing of the manuscript before the peer review process. If plagiarism is detected at this stage or latter, the manuscript is rejected and is not reconsidered in any of our journals. In serious issues of scientific misconduct, our editors will investigate the allegations of publication/scientific misconduct (as explained in Retraction section) and may take appropriate action if the allegations are proven. Authors are expected to comply with the best ethical publication practices when publishing in our journals.
Despite our precautions and honest transparent processes, a controversy can emerge on an unpublished or published article. In such circumstances, the matter will first be documented by the Executive/Managing Editor and Editor-in-Chief, and then will be placed in front of all the Editorial Board of the journal concerned. As per the majority decision of the Editorial Board Members, further action will be taken.
The journals of The Grassroots Institute manage the manuscripts using online submission system. When a manuscript is submitted, the author/submitter (user) creates an online account in the system using a login and password. After submission of the manuscript, the user can track the process/fate of the manuscript through Dashboard. User’s dashboard has a table that will show the Status of the manuscript. A copy of the published paper can be downloaded from this route.
The alternate route of accessing your published paper is to browse the issues of the journal in which paper was submitted. Two-three layers of information about the paper are uploaded on webpages of the journal. The recently published papers and the past issues of different journals are easily accessible and can be downloaded from the links:
Grassroots Journal of Natural Resources
Journal of Environmental Law & Policy
Journal of Policy & Governance
Agrobiodiversity & Agroecology
Pastures & Pastoralism
All published articles are free to access and download by anyone. Authors can also download their papers. Readers can read and download any published without any fee or restriction. The recently published papers and the past issues of different journals are easily accessible and can be downloaded from the links:
Grassroots Journal of Natural Resources
Journal of Environmental Law & Policy
Journal of Policy & Governance
Agrobiodiversity & Agroecology
Pastures & Pastoralism
Any specific enquiry about the journal should be directed to respective journal. The Editorial Office will be glad to address your queries. In case of any matter related to The Grassroots Institute, please visit the dedicated independent website of the Institute. The independent websites and email contacts are:
Promoting your published work is an important part of the post-publication process which will increase the visibility, impact and citation of your work. The Grassroots Institute can support you to promote your research papers within your scientific community, as well as to a wide audience. You are highly recommended to adopt the following:
Social Media
Link Share
Academic Research-Sharing Platforms
Conferences
Video
Wikipedia
Authors publishing with the journals of The Grassroots Institute retain the copyright of their work under the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY). This license allows others to copy, distribute, display, and perform the work, provided that the original work is properly cited.
By submitting a manuscript for publication, Authors agree to the following terms.
The journals published The Grassroots Institute allow the author(s) to hold the copyright without restrictions and will retain publishing rights without restrictions.
The submitted papers are assumed to contain no proprietary material unprotected by patent or patent application; responsibility for technical content and for protection of proprietary material rests solely with the author(s) and their organizations and is not the responsibility of our journals or its Editorial Staff. The main (first/corresponding) author is responsible for ensuring that the article has been seen and approved by all the other authors. It is the responsibility of the author to obtain all necessary copyright release permissions for the use of any copyrighted materials in the manuscript prior to the submission.
What are the rights of author(s)?
It is important to check the policy for the journal to which you are submitting or publishing to establish your rights as author(s). Our standard policies allow the following re-use rights:
Preprint version
The preprint version is defined as the submitted unpublished version of an article, which has not been peer-reviewed, officially accepted into a journal, or had any value added to it by the journal of The Grassroots Institute (such as copyediting, typesetting, metadata formatting, etc.). Authors may place their preprint manuscript on a non-commercial institutional repository, subject repository, archive, not-for-profit preprint repository or personal website at any time. This is not subject to an embargo. Once accepted for publication in our journal, authors should add the following note to the front page:
This is a pre-peer review preprint of an article that has been accepted for publication in [name of journal, volume, issue, year].
Upon publication, authors should link the preprint to the final published article (version of record) by adding the following note to the first page:
This is a pre-peer review preprint © [name of author, year]. The definitive, peer reviewed and edited version of this article is published in [name of journal, volume, issue, pages, year, DOI link].
Preprints should not be enhanced or formatted in any way to appear like the accepted manuscript or final published version. Authors are not permitted to replace the preprint with the accepted manuscript or the final published version.
Accepted manuscript
An accepted manuscript (or post-print file) is defined as the version of the paper after peer review, with revisions having been made, but before copy-editing and typesetting have taken place. The accepted manuscript can be made publicly visible in a non-commercial, institutional or subject repository. Authors should link the accepted manuscript to the final published article (version of record) by adding the following note to the first page:
© [name of author, year]. The definitive, peer reviewed and edited version of this article is published in [name of journal, volume, issue, pages, year, DOI link].
Authors are only permitted to consider republishing any part of the accepted contribution after the article is published in the journal.
The authors need to abide by the terms of the licence form, The author retains all moral and proprietary rights that are not in conflict with the terms of this licence. This includes ownership of all patent and trademark rights to any process or procedure, or any other form of intellectual property contained in the accepted contribution.
Users may access, view, copy and download the accepted manuscript for personal, non-commercial use of academic or educational nature. Users may not modify the content, remove any copyright notices or author information, or create derivative works.
Final published version (version of record)
The start date for this policy is the article’s publication date.
The version of record as the final published PDF, XML or HTML version of the article. The author is permitted to post, print, or otherwise distribute the journal’s version of record/final PDF or XML published version without permission. Quotations from the article may be used, provided these are of a reasonable and necessary length only, and there is a full citation to the original source using the DOI. Users may not modify the content, remove any copyright notices or author information, or create derivative works.
All the journals of The Grassroots Institute follow the Sherpa Policy for Deposit with its embed code.
By signing the Consent Form of respective journal, the authors retain the rights of self-archiving. Following are the important features of self-archiving policy of the journals of The Grassroots Institute:
All the journals of The Grassroots Institute store all back issues and current articles on its respective websites.
To ensure permanent access to our published content and for long-term preservation of the content published in our journals, all the journals of The Grassroots Institute deposit published articles in (1) Internet Archive, (2) WorldCat (3) Other databases [e.g. Crossref, EuroPub, Scilit, Publons, SSRN, DRJI, Cite Factor, Academia.edu, Dimensions, Research Gate, ZENODO, Scribd, Research Square, etc.].
Go to Top